These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Community rating in the Kaiser-Permanente Medical Care Program. Anderson RV; Auger N Top Health Care Financ; 1981; 8(2):35-49. PubMed ID: 7034293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HMO/CMP review is up and running (finally). Traska MR Hospitals; 1987 Nov; 61(21):55-6. PubMed ID: 3311965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Guidelines for contracting with prepaid health plans. Kadzielski MA Health Prog; 1986 Nov; 67(9):14, 16. PubMed ID: 10279348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Are gatekeepers good for medicine? Paxton HT Med Econ; 1986 Dec; 63(26):60-5. PubMed ID: 10279839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Insurers moving to get data before contracting. Traska MR; Masters G Hospitals; 1987 Feb; 61(4):52, 56. PubMed ID: 3804278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pay-for-performance: a perspective from the Connecticut State Medical Society Independent Practice Association (CSMS-IPA). Sacks KL Conn Med; 2007 Apr; 71(4):227-8. PubMed ID: 17487009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical societies' prepaid plans resemble unions, observers say. Richman D Mod Healthc; 1986 Apr; 16(9):29. PubMed ID: 10276448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Questioning the quality of health services. Shouldice R Med Group Manage J; 1988; 35(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 10302220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient-centered medical home: a commentary by the CSMS-IPA. Sacks KL Conn Med; 2009; 73(10):611-2. PubMed ID: 19947062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of patient satisfaction among prepaid and fee-for-service patients. Murray JP J Fam Pract; 1987 Feb; 24(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 3806032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can you meet these IPA performance benchmarks? Capitation Manag Rep; 1998 Mar; 5(3):42-4. PubMed ID: 10178026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lack of interest in accreditation for prepaid groups dooms TMQC (The Medical Quality Commission). Capitation Manag Rep; 1998 Mar; 5(3):40-2. PubMed ID: 10178025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review of a small group practice. Phillips TJ; Braturde AP; Wood FC J Fam Pract; 1974 May; 1(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 4452840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health outcomes for a chronic disease in prepaid group practice and fee for service settings. The case of rheumatoid arthritis. Yelin EH; Shearn MA; Epstein WV Med Care; 1986 Mar; 24(3):236-47. PubMed ID: 3951265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Address of the President. Grendon DA Conn Med; 1973 Jul; 37(7):373-4. PubMed ID: 4736773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk control. Schropp ML Group Pract; 1975; 24(5):8-11, 28. PubMed ID: 10237473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Connecticut's Medicare B assignment rate. Council of the Connecticut State Medical Society. Conn Med; 1977 Nov; 41(11):719-26. PubMed ID: 334457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accreditation agency for capitated groups looks for bigger role. Jaklevic MC Mod Healthc; 1996 Apr; 26(16):52. PubMed ID: 10156904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]