These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35952404)

  • 1. Peer review as a measurable responsibility of those who publish: The peer review debt index.
    Fiedorowicz JG; Kleinstäuber M; Lemogne C; Löwe B; Ola B; Sutin A; Wong S; Fabiano N; Tilburg MV; Mikocka-Walus A
    J Psychosom Res; 2022 Oct; 161():110997. PubMed ID: 35952404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Problem Is Not Professional Publishing, But the Publish-or-Perish Culture.
    Génova G; de la Vara JL
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Apr; 25(2):617-619. PubMed ID: 29350352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review as professional responsibility: a quality control system only as good as the participants.
    Grainger DW
    Biomaterials; 2007 Dec; 28(34):5199-203. PubMed ID: 17643484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.
    Dadkhah M; Kahani M; Borchardt G
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1603-1610. PubMed ID: 28812275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review, scientific publishing and the law of reciprocity.
    Paul C
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2024 Jun; 38(6):988-989. PubMed ID: 38794924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Success in Publishing: Selecting an Appropriate Journal and Braving the Peer-review Process.
    Tullu MS; Karande S
    J Postgrad Med; 2018; 64(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 29386410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher.
    Henriquez T
    mBio; 2023 Oct; 14(5):e0194823. PubMed ID: 37811986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Publishing operational research from 'real life' programme data: a better form of accountability.
    Rujumba J; Byamugisha R
    Trop Med Int Health; 2012 Jan; 17(1):133-4. PubMed ID: 21951461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer.
    Bluestone N
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9074317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.
    Tarkang EE; Bain LE
    Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Publishing: Journals could share peer-review data.
    Squazzoni F; Grimaldo F; Marušić A
    Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7658):352. PubMed ID: 28617464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Training the next generation of peer reviewers: Steps for guiding pharmacy learners through the peer review process.
    Johnson PN; Parman A; Miller JL
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2024 Feb; 81(5):e137-e140. PubMed ID: 37946575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer Review, Confidential Comments to the Editor, and the Golden Rule.
    Swanson E
    Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jan; 90(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 36409929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new twist on peer review.
    Patterson M; Schekman R
    Elife; 2018 Jun; 7():. PubMed ID: 29944117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving peer review: What authors can do.
    Baker WL; DiDomenico RJ; Haines ST
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2017 Dec; 74(24):2076-2079. PubMed ID: 29074481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental publishing: Peer review reviewed.
    Bal AM; Mahawar KK
    Br Dent J; 2016 Dec; 221(11):686. PubMed ID: 27932847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. To publish or not to publish.
    Winslow RM
    J Lab Clin Med; 2005 Apr; 145(4):221; discussion 222. PubMed ID: 15962841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Keep calm and carry on: moral panic, predatory publishers, peer review, and the emperor's new clothes.
    Houghton F
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2022 Apr; 110(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 35440900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some opinions on the review process of research papers destined for publication.
    Roohi E; Mahian O
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Jun; 21(3):809-12. PubMed ID: 24781873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.