These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35952651)

  • 1. Sources of automatic office blood pressure measurement error: a systematic review.
    Liu J; Li Y; Li J; Zheng D; Liu C
    Physiol Meas; 2022 Sep; 43(9):. PubMed ID: 35952651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol.
    Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Protogerou A; Nasothimiou E; Kapralos C
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Oct; 13(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 18799957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
    Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the accuracy and errors of blood pressure measured by 2 types of non-mercury sphygmomanometers in an epidemiological survey.
    Choi S; Kim YM; Shin J; Lim YH; Choi SY; Choi BY; Oh KW; Lee HM; Woo KJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e10851. PubMed ID: 29923975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings With Other Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement for Identifying Patients With Possible Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Roerecke M; Kaczorowski J; Myers MG
    JAMA Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 179(3):351-362. PubMed ID: 30715088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct comparison of an automated oscillometric device with an electronic auscultatory device for epidemiologic survey to evaluate the prevalence of hypertension.
    Kim YM; Ohn DW; Kim SH; Kim DH; Park SM; Cho IJ; Ihm SH; Sung KC; Oh KW; Shin J; Lee EM
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Dec; 101(50):e32299. PubMed ID: 36550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement reliability of automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor in the elderly with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park SH; Choi YK
    Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 31714346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement accuracy of a stand-alone oscillometric central blood pressure monitor: a validation report for Microlife WatchBP Office Central.
    Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH
    Am J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 26(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 23382326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous blood pressure measurement in both arms in hypertensive and nonhypertensive adult patients.
    Fonseca-Reyes S; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM; García de Alba-García JE
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 22781632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation Study to Determine the Accuracy of Central Blood Pressure Measurement Using the Sphygmocor Xcel Cuff Device.
    Schultz MG; Picone DS; Armstrong MK; Black JA; Dwyer N; Roberts-Thomson P; Sharman JE
    Hypertension; 2020 Jul; 76(1):244-250. PubMed ID: 32475318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Office blood pressure measurement in the 21st century.
    Myers MG; Asmar R; Staessen JA
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2018 Jul; 20(7):1104-1107. PubMed ID: 30003698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of the Withings BPM Connect Device for Self-Blood Pressure Measurements in General Population - Validation According to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard.
    Topouchian J; Zelveian P; Hakobyan Z; Gharibyan H; Asmar R
    Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2022; 18():191-200. PubMed ID: 35386428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Araujo-Moura K; Souza LG; Mello GL; De Moraes ACF
    Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 34272985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical analysis of blood pressure measurement errors by oscillometry during surgical operations.
    Tao G; Chen Y; Wen C; Bi M
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Dec; 16(6):285-90. PubMed ID: 22045016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using semi-automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement in diabetic patients and their offspring.
    Kuo CS; Hwu CM; Kwok CF; Hsiao LC; Weih MJ; Lee SH; Ho LT
    J Diabetes Complications; 2000; 14(5):288-93. PubMed ID: 11113693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of resting blood pressure measurement and classification using an oscillometric device in children with chronic kidney disease.
    Flynn JT; Pierce CB; Miller ER; Charleston J; Samuels JA; Kupferman J; Furth SL; Warady BA;
    J Pediatr; 2012 Mar; 160(3):434-440.e1. PubMed ID: 22048052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
    Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
    J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.