121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35953339)
21. Morphometric Analysis of Sella Turcica Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
Yalcin ED
J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(1):306-309. PubMed ID: 31449220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dimensions and morphologic variations of sella turcica in type 1 diabetic patients.
Canigur Bavbek N; Dincer M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 24485732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Radiological analysis of the sella turcica and its correlations with body mass index in a North Indian population.
Gargi V; Ravi Prakash SM; Nagaraju K; Malik S; Goel S; Gupta S
Oral Radiol; 2019 May; 35(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 30484194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impaction of maxillary canines and its effect on the position of adjacent teeth and canine development: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Dekel E; Nucci L; Weill T; Flores-Mir C; Becker A; Perillo L; Chaushu S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Feb; 159(2):e135-e147. PubMed ID: 33388201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of variations in the sella turcica in a Turkish population.
Isman O; Kayar S; Murat Aktan A
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2020; 79(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 30973637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Association between sella turcica bridging and impacted maxillary canines.
Vitali FC; Cardoso IV; Cardoso M; Duque TM; Vieira GL
Gen Dent; 2022; 70(4):54-58. PubMed ID: 35749248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictive Analysis of Maxillary Canine Impaction through
Guarnieri R; Germanò F; Altieri F; Cassetta M; Grenga C; Padalino G; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
Methods Protoc; 2022 Nov; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 36412813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Unilateral vs Bilateral Maxillary Canine Impaction: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study of Patterns and Associations.
Alshehri A; Hakami Z; Marran K; Qaysi A; Shabi M; Bokhari A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jan; 24(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 37189008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sella turcica variations in patients with transverse skeletal discrepancies versus patients with normal transverse relationships. a cross- sectional study.
Seifeldin N; Eltimamy A; Abbady NA
BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):301. PubMed ID: 37198587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Association Between Variations In Sella Turcica Dimensions And Morphology And Skeletal Malocclusions.
Afzal E; Fida M
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2019; 31(2):172-177. PubMed ID: 31094110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predictive factors associated with adjacent teeth root resorption of palatally impacted canines in Arabian population: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
Al-Kyssi HA; Al-Mogahed NM; Altawili ZM; Dahan FN; Almashraqi AA; Aldhorae K; Alhammadi MS
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun; 22(1):220. PubMed ID: 35658855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of the relationship between size, shape and volume of the sella turcica in class II and III patients prior to orthognathic surgery.
Silveira BT; Fernandes KS; Trivino T; Dos Santos LYF; de Freitas CF
Surg Radiol Anat; 2020 May; 42(5):577-582. PubMed ID: 31901966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Morphology of palatally impacted canines: A case-controlled cone-beam volumetric tomography study.
Hettiarachchi PV; Olive RJ; Monsour P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):357-362. PubMed ID: 28153166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Morphometric evaluation of sella turcica and cranial base in patients with congenital absence of teeth.
Li Y; Wang Z; Liu J; Yan Z; Xiao C; Wang J; Xiong X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Oct; 40(5):582-588. PubMed ID: 38596980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Skeletal and dentoalveolar bilateral dimensions in unilateral palatally impacted canine using cone beam computed tomography.
D Oleo-Aracena MF; Arriola-Guillén LE; Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA; Ruíz-Mora GA
Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):7. PubMed ID: 28164257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sella turcica bridging and dental anomalies: is there an association?
Scribante A; Sfondrini MF; Cassani M; Fraticelli D; Beccari S; Gandini P
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Nov; 27(6):568-573. PubMed ID: 28387468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of root apex's position between unilateral and bilateral palatally impacted canines: A pilot study.
Oh S; Kim YI; Kim SS; Park SB; Kim SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Mar; 163(3):311-318. PubMed ID: 36404174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Relationship between Dental Follicle Width and Maxillary Impacted Canines' Descriptive and Resorptive Features Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Dağsuyu İM; Okşayan R; Kahraman F; Aydın M; Bayrakdar İŞ; Uğurlu M
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():2938691. PubMed ID: 29226129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic accuracy of lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography for the assessment of sella turcica bridging.
Acevedo AM; Lagravere-Vich M; Al-Jewair T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Aug; 160(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 33975746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is There a Relationship Between Unilateral/Bilateral Impacted Maxillary Canines and Nasal Septum Deviation?
Kucukkaraca E
Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e47931. PubMed ID: 38034237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
