These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35957298)

  • 1. Effect of Behavioral Precaution on Braking Operation of Elderly Drivers under Cognitive Workloads.
    Kajiwara Y; Murata E
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(15):. PubMed ID: 35957298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting the Coping Skills of Older Drivers in the Face of Unexpected Situation.
    Kajiwara Y; Kimura H
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 33802716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Real-world risk exposure in older drivers with cognitive and visual dysfunction.
    Merickel J; High R; Dawson J; Rizzo M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S110-S115. PubMed ID: 31821019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of drivers' deceleration behavior based on naturalistic driving data.
    Li S; Li P; Yao Y; Han X; Xu Y; Chen L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 31986072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of an integrated collision warning system on risk compensation behavior: An examination under naturalistic driving conditions.
    Yu B; Bao S; Chen Y; LeBlanc DJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106450. PubMed ID: 34678549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of alcohol use on accelerating and braking behaviors of drivers.
    Yadav AK; Velaga NR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(4):353-358. PubMed ID: 31039040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does intersection field of view influence driving safety in an emergent situation?
    Yan X; Zhang X; Xue Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():162-175. PubMed ID: 30036817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modelling braking behaviour and accident probability of drivers under increasing time pressure conditions.
    Pawar NM; Khanuja RK; Choudhary P; Velaga NR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 136():105401. PubMed ID: 31884236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimal study of young male drivers' responses to vehicle collision using EMG of lower extremity.
    Gao Z; Li C; Hu H; Zhao H; Chen C; Yu H
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S563-73. PubMed ID: 26406050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
    Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
    Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
    J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Car drivers coping with hazardous events in real versus simulated situations: Declarative, behavioral and physiological data used to assess drivers' feeling of presence.
    Gemonet E; Bougard C; Masfrand S; Honnet V; Mestre DR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0247373. PubMed ID: 33606849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling how drivers respond to a bicyclist crossing their path at an intersection: How do test track and driving simulator compare?
    Boda CN; Dozza M; Bohman K; Thalya P; Larsson A; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():238-250. PubMed ID: 29248617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Driver braking behavior analysis to improve autonomous emergency braking systems in typical Chinese vehicle-bicycle conflicts.
    Duan J; Li R; Hou L; Wang W; Li G; Li SE; Cheng B; Gao H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():74-82. PubMed ID: 28858775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavioural accident avoidance science: understanding response in collision incipient conditions.
    Hancock PA; de Ridder SN
    Ergonomics; 2003 Oct; 46(12):1111-35. PubMed ID: 12933076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monitoring drivers' mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures.
    Brookhuis KA; de Waard D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):898-903. PubMed ID: 20380918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.