BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35957387)

  • 1. Intelligent User Interfaces and Their Evaluation: A Systematic Mapping Study.
    Brdnik S; Heričko T; Šumak B
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(15):. PubMed ID: 35957387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensors and Artificial Intelligence Methods and Algorithms for Human-Computer Intelligent Interaction: A Systematic Mapping Study.
    Šumak B; Brdnik S; Pušnik M
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Dec; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 35009562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards a holistic assessment of the user experience with hybrid BCIs.
    Lorenz R; Pascual J; Blankertz B; Vidaurre C
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Jun; 11(3):035007. PubMed ID: 24835132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. USER FRUSTRATION IN HIT INTERFACES: EXPLORING PAST HCI RESEARCH FOR A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF CLINICIANS' EXPERIENCES.
    Opoku-Boateng GA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2015; 2015():1008-17. PubMed ID: 26958238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applications of an interaction, process, integration and intelligence (IPII) design approach for ergonomics solutions.
    Xu W; Furie D; Mahabhaleshwar M; Suresh B; Chouhan H
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jul; 62(7):954-980. PubMed ID: 30836051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intuitive user interfaces (IUI): a CASE starting point for design and programming.
    Bödi RA; Kaulich TW
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1992 Mar; 37(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 1643860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding UX Better: A New Technique to Go beyond Emotion Assessment.
    Marques L; Matsubara PG; Nakamura WT; Ferreira BM; Wiese IS; Gadelha BF; Zaina LM; Redmiles D; Conte TU
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FriWalk robotic walker: usability, acceptance and UX evaluation after a pilot study in a real environment.
    Pérez-Rodríguez R; Moreno-Sánchez PA; Valdés-Aragonés M; Oviedo-Briones M; Divan S; García-Grossocordón N; Rodríguez-Mañas L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Aug; 15(6):718-727. PubMed ID: 31172819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Affordance-Based Framework for Human Computation and Human-Computer Collaboration.
    Crouser RJ; Chang R
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Dec; 18(12):2859-68. PubMed ID: 26357195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Usability and User Experience of Cognitive Intervention Technologies for Elderly People With MCI or Dementia: A Systematic Review.
    Contreras-Somoza LM; Irazoki E; Toribio-Guzmán JM; de la Torre-Díez I; Diaz-Baquero AA; Parra-Vidales E; Perea-Bartolomé MV; Franco-Martín MÁ
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():636116. PubMed ID: 33967901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A User Interface (UI) and User eXperience (UX) evaluation framework for cyberlearning environments in computer science and software engineering education.
    Alomari HW; Ramasamy V; Kiper JD; Potvin G
    Heliyon; 2020 May; 6(5):e03917. PubMed ID: 32426541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EXecutive-Functions Innovative Tool (EXIT 360°): A Usability and User Experience Study of an Original 360°-Based Assessment Instrument.
    Borgnis F; Baglio F; Pedroli E; Rossetto F; Isernia S; Uccellatore L; Riva G; Cipresso P
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 34502758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring and Improving User Experience Through Artificial Intelligence-Aided Design.
    Yang B; Wei L; Pu Z
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():595374. PubMed ID: 33329260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usability, user experience and accessibility: towards an integrative model.
    Sauer J; Sonderegger A; Schmutz S
    Ergonomics; 2020 Oct; 63(10):1207-1220. PubMed ID: 32450782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation for VR glasses system user experience: The influence factors of interactive operation and motion sickness.
    Yu M; Zhou R; Wang H; Zhao W
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():206-213. PubMed ID: 30487101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing two anesthesia information management system user interfaces: a usability evaluation.
    Wanderer JP; Rao AV; Rothwell SH; Ehrenfeld JM
    Can J Anaesth; 2012 Nov; 59(11):1023-31. PubMed ID: 23055030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel Bluetooth-Enabled Tubeless Insulin Pump: A User Experience Design Approach for a Connected Digital Diabetes Management Platform.
    Pillalamarri SS; Huyett LM; Abdel-Malek A
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Nov; 12(6):1132-1142. PubMed ID: 30304951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An empirical evaluation of a hands-free computer interaction for users with motor disabilities.
    Šumak B; Špindler M; Debeljak M; Heričko M; Pušnik M
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Aug; 96():103249. PubMed ID: 31295624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of distinct input methods of an intelligent wheelchair in simulated and real environments: a performance and usability study.
    Faria BM; Vasconcelos S; Reis LP; Lau N
    Assist Technol; 2013; 25(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 23923691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Narrative Review of Methods for Applying User Experience in the Design and Assessment of Mental Health Smartphone Interventions.
    Lemon C; Huckvale K; Carswell K; Torous J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020; 36(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 31973787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.