BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35960060)

  • 1. Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis.
    Imaizumi K; Homma S; Miyaoka Y; Matsui H; Ichikawa N; Yoshida T; Takahashi N; Taketomi A
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Aug; 101(32):e29869. PubMed ID: 35960060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oncological outcomes following minimally invasive surgery for pathological N2M0 colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Sueda T; Tei M; Mori S; Nishida K; Yoshikawa Y; Nomura M; Matsumura T; Koga C; Miyagaki H; Tsujie M; Akamaru Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Oct; 15(4):781-793. PubMed ID: 35715936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer are comparable with those for open surgery: analysis of 1,013 minimally invasive surgeries at a single institution.
    Oh SY; Kwon S; Lee KG; Suh YS; Choe HN; Kong SH; Lee HJ; Kim WH; Yang HK
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Mar; 28(3):789-95. PubMed ID: 24263458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Minimally Invasive Pelvic Multivisceral Resection Approach for Locally Advanced Primary Colorectal Cancers: A Single-Institution Experience.
    Lee TH; Park H; Baek SJ; Kwak JM; Kim SH; Kim J
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Jul; 32(7):727-732. PubMed ID: 34677096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive surgery is feasible after preoperative chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer.
    Yamamoto K; Omori T; Hara H; Shinno N; Sugimura K; Miyata H; Takahashi H; Fujiwara Y; Ohue M; Yano M
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2020 Jul; 4(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 32724883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive surgery for T4 colon cancer is associated with better outcomes compared to open surgery in the National Cancer Database.
    El-Sharkawy F; Gushchin V; Plerhoples TA; Liu C; Emery EL; Collins DT; Bijelic L
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Apr; 47(4):818-827. PubMed ID: 32951935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older.
    Kwon IG; Cho I; Guner A; Kim HI; Noh SH; Hyung WJ
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2321-30. PubMed ID: 25480603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study.
    Seng C; Siddiqui MA; Wong KP; Zhang K; Yeo W; Tan SB; Yue WM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):2049-55. PubMed ID: 23963015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive versus open pelvic exenterations for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of perioperative and 3-year oncological outcomes.
    Kazi M; Kumar NAN; Rohila J; Sukumar V; Engineer R; Ankathi S; Desouza A; Saklani A
    BJS Open; 2021 Sep; 5(5):. PubMed ID: 34518872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive versus open intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: long-term oncologic outcomes.
    Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11001. PubMed ID: 34040037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mini-invasive
    Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive versus open radical resection surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparable outcomes associated with advantages of minimal invasiveness.
    Tang W; Qiu JG; Deng X; Liu SS; Cheng L; Liu JR; Du CY
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0248534. PubMed ID: 33705481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term oncological outcomes for minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer-a population-based nationwide study with a non-inferiority design.
    Jadid KD; Cao Y; Petersson J; Sjövall A; Angenete E; Matthiessen P
    Colorectal Dis; 2023 May; 25(5):954-963. PubMed ID: 36762443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting the selection of minimally invasive surgery for stage 0/I colorectal cancer.
    Kim DH; Kim IY; Kim BR; Kim YW
    Int J Surg; 2015 Apr; 16(Pt A):44-48. PubMed ID: 25749437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer with liver metastasis: a comparison with open surgery.
    Li J; Xi H; Cui J; Zhang K; Gao Y; Liang W; Cai A; Wei B; Chen L
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 29075971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive surgery for remnant gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery.
    Kwon IG; Cho I; Guner A; Choi YY; Shin HB; Kim HI; An JY; Cheong JH; Noh SH; Hyung WJ
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Aug; 28(8):2452-8. PubMed ID: 24622766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced recovery pathway in open and minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective study on feasibility, compliance, and outcomes in a high-volume resource limited tertiary cancer center.
    Thomas M; Agarwal V; DeSouza A; Joshi R; Mali M; Panhale K; Salvi OK; Ambulkar R; Shrikhande S; Saklani A
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Feb; 408(1):99. PubMed ID: 36811742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors.
    Wong AP; Lall RR; Dahdaleh NS; Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Wong RH; Harvey MJ; Lam S; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E11. PubMed ID: 26235009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.