These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35960336)

  • 1. The SNARC effect: a preregistered study on the interaction of horizontal, vertical, and sagittal spatial-numerical associations.
    Aleotti S; Massaccesi S; Priftis K
    Psychol Res; 2023 Jun; 87(4):1256-1266. PubMed ID: 35960336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numbers around Descartes: A preregistered study on the three-dimensional SNARC effect.
    Aleotti S; Di Girolamo F; Massaccesi S; Priftis K
    Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104111. PubMed ID: 31731115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children's spatial-numerical associations on horizontal, vertical, and sagittal axes.
    Cooney SM; Holmes CA; Newell FN
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Sep; 209():105169. PubMed ID: 33957297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The SNARC effect in two dimensions: Evidence for a frontoparallel mental number plane.
    Hesse PN; Bremmer F
    Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():85-96. PubMed ID: 27836333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect.
    van Dijck JP; Doricchi F
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 30739136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the interactions among SNARC effect, finger counting direction and embodied cognition.
    Prete G; Tommasi L
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9155. PubMed ID: 32435547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers.
    Tan S; Dixon P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):84-97. PubMed ID: 21668090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanism of the SNARC Effect in Numerical Magnitude, Time Sequence, and Spatial Sequence Tasks: Involvement of LTM and WM.
    Wang Q; Liu M; Shi W; Kang J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1558. PubMed ID: 30186215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. There is more than "more is up": Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes.
    Hartmann M; Gashaj V; Stahnke A; Mast FW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1401-14. PubMed ID: 24749934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-symbolic numerosities do not automatically activate spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
    Cleland AA; Corsico K; White K; Bull R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 31432745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No fingers, no SNARC? Neither the finger counting starting hand, nor its stability robustly affect the SNARC effect.
    Hohol M; Wołoszyn K; Cipora K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Oct; 230():103765. PubMed ID: 36242923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SNARC compatibility triggers positive affect.
    Gerten J; Topolinski S
    Cogn Emot; 2021 Mar; 35(2):356-366. PubMed ID: 33174803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Switching between Multiple Codes of SNARC-Like Associations: Two Conceptual Replication Attempts with Anodal tDCS in Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Design.
    Schroeder PA; Nuerk HC; Plewnia C
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():654. PubMed ID: 29217996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Goal-directed reaching: the SNARC effect influences movement planning but not movement execution.
    Bingley T; Heath M
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(3):223-40. PubMed ID: 21864464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cross-sectional developmental examination of the SNARC effect in a visually-guided grasping task.
    Mills KJ; Rousseau BR; Gonzalez CL
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 58():99-106. PubMed ID: 24732383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?
    Mapelli D; Rusconi E; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2003 Jul; 88(3):B1-10. PubMed ID: 12804817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.