These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3596056)

  • 1. Stimulus duration as an age-dependent factor in reflex blinking.
    Anthony BJ; Zeigler BL; Graham FK
    Dev Psychobiol; 1987 May; 20(3):285-97. PubMed ID: 3596056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of change in lead stimulus modality on the modulation of acoustic blink startle.
    Lipp OV; Siddle DA; Dall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Nov; 37(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 11117451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of acoustic reflex and behavioral thresholds as a function of stimulus frequency and duration.
    Barry SJ; Resnick SB
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(2):35-7. PubMed ID: 977428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory-visual temporal integration measured by shifts in perceived temporal location.
    Jaekl PM; Harris LR
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 17428607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of multimodal attention in young infants: modification of the startle reflex by attention.
    Richards JE
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jan; 37(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 10705768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of warning stimulus modality on blink startle modification in reaction time tasks.
    Lipp OV; Siddle DA; Dall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jan; 37(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 10705767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiovisual integration of stimulus transients.
    Andersen TS; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(25):2537-44. PubMed ID: 18801382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of stimulus modality and task difficulty on attentional modulation of blink startle.
    Neumann DL; Lipp OV; McHugh MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2004 May; 41(3):407-16. PubMed ID: 15102126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differentiation between protective reflexes: cardiac defense and startle.
    Ramírez I; Sánchez MB; Fernández MC; Lipp OV; Vila J
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Nov; 42(6):732-9. PubMed ID: 16364069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of multisensory spatial integration and perception in humans.
    Neil PA; Chee-Ruiter C; Scheier C; Lewkowicz DJ; Shimojo S
    Dev Sci; 2006 Sep; 9(5):454-64. PubMed ID: 16911447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The temporal window of integration in elderly and young adults.
    Horváth J; Czigler I; Winkler I; Teder-Sälejärvi WA
    Neurobiol Aging; 2007 Jun; 28(6):964-75. PubMed ID: 16793177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ceponiene R; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():53-68. PubMed ID: 18482717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory evoked potentials in the detection of interaural intensity differences in children and adults.
    Wambacq IJ; Koehnke J; Shea-Miller KJ; Besing J; Toth V; Abubakr A
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):320-31. PubMed ID: 17485981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of stimulus modality and task condition on blink startle modification and on electrodermal responses.
    Lipp OV; Siddle DA; Dall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jul; 35(4):452-61. PubMed ID: 9643060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural latencies do not explain the auditory and audio-visual flash-lag effect.
    Arrighi R; Alais D; Burr D
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(23):2917-25. PubMed ID: 16115662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory-visual temporal integration as a function of distance: no compensation for sound-transmission time in human perception.
    Lewald J; Guski R
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Mar; 357(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 15036589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prestimulation effects on blink and cardiac reflexes of 15-month human infants.
    Balaban MT; Anthony BJ; Graham FK
    Dev Psychobiol; 1989 Mar; 22(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 2925000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.