These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35965228)

  • 1. Navigating the Ophthalmology & Urology Match with a Significant Other.
    Massenzio SS; Uhler TA; Massenzio EM; Sun E; Srikumaran D; Clifton MM; Green LK; Sun G; Wang J; Woreta FA
    J Surg Educ; 2023 Jan; 80(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 35965228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Virtual Urology Residency Match Process: Moving Beyond the Pandemic.
    Carpinito GP; Khouri RK; Kenigsberg AP; Ganesan V; Kuprasertkul A; Caldwell KM; Hudak SJ; Lemack GE
    Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():33-38. PubMed ID: 34280439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Key factors for residency interview selection from the National Resident Matching Program: analysis of residency Program Director surveys, 2016-2020.
    Stone CL; Dogbey GY; Falls J; Kuo YP
    J Osteopath Med; 2023 Oct; 123(11):523-530. PubMed ID: 37615082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The COVID-19 Residency Application Cycle Did Not Affect Geographic Dispersal Patterns Among Applicants Entering the Urology Match: A Quantitative Mapping Study.
    Gabrielson AT; Meilchen CK; Kohn JR; Kohn TP
    Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():26-32. PubMed ID: 34324912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current Applicant Perceptions of the Ophthalmology Residency Match.
    Venincasa MJ; Cai LZ; Gedde SJ; Uhler T; Sridhar J
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 138(5):460-466. PubMed ID: 32163107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference Signaling in the 2022 Urology Residency Match - The Applicant Perspective.
    Leopold Z; Rajagopalan A; Mikhail M; Lee G; Tabakin A; Park JH; Jang T; Elsamra SE; Singer EA
    Urology; 2022 Dec; 170():33-37. PubMed ID: 36195167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Urology Match Process and the Limited Value of Post-Interview Communication for Program Directors.
    Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Srivastava A; Pandya SS; Kaplan A; Radadia KD; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
    Urology; 2019 Jun; 128():23-30. PubMed ID: 30844386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The National Resident Matching Program Code of Conduct: What Is the Perceived Degree of Compliance During the Urology Match Process?
    Sebesta EM; Lipsky MJ; Nunez M; Cooper KL; Badalato GM
    Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():37-43. PubMed ID: 29935263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applicant Characteristics Associated with Glaucoma Fellowship Match from 2010 to 2017.
    Burton E; Arsiwala LT; Johnson TV; Srikumaran D; Zafar S; Woreta FA
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(2):233-240. PubMed ID: 34455134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survey of Applicant Experience and Cost in the Urology Match: Opportunities for Reform.
    Nikonow TN; Lyon TD; Jackman SV; Averch TD
    J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1063-7. PubMed ID: 25912495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning From the 2021 Ophthalmology Match: Virtual Residency Matching During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Aggarwal S; Wisely CE; Syed M; Siatkowski RM; Challa P
    J Grad Med Educ; 2022 Dec; 14(6):674-679. PubMed ID: 36591419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the 1990-2007 neurosurgery residency match: does applicant gender affect neurosurgery match outcome?
    Durham SR; Donaldson K; Grady MS; Benzil DL
    J Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 129(2):282-289. PubMed ID: 29882698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology.
    Grauer R; Ranti D; Greene K; Gorin MA; Menon M; Zorc S
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jan; 6(1):e2250974. PubMed ID: 36662528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fellowship Match Outcomes in the U.S. From 2010 to 2017: Analysis of San Francisco Match.
    Zafar S; Bressler NM; Golnik KC; Srikumaran D; Ghous Z; Ip S; Chen X; Woreta FA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 218():261-267. PubMed ID: 32574772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What makes a medical student avoid or enter a career in urology? Results of an international survey.
    Kerfoot BP; Nabha KS; Masser BA; McCullough DL
    J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1953-7. PubMed ID: 16217365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the Urology Program Directors Perspective on the Current Resident Selection Process: The Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Urology Program Directors.
    Movassaghi M; Lemack GE; Badalato GM; Broderick G; Greene K; Ibeziako O; Mirza M; Murphy A; Thavaseelan S; Wolter C; Takacs E
    J Surg Educ; 2023 Jun; 80(6):900-906. PubMed ID: 36914481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ophthalmology Residency Match outcomes for 2011.
    Yousuf SJ; Jones LS
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):642-6. PubMed ID: 22218141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of matching in an ophthalmology residency program.
    Loh AR; Joseph D; Keenan JD; Lietman TM; Naseri A
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Apr; 120(4):865-70. PubMed ID: 23260256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ophthalmology Residency Match in the Covid-19 Era: Applicant and Program Director Perceptions of the 2020-2021 Application Cycle.
    Venincasa MJ; Steren B; Young BK; Parikh A; Ahmed B; Sridhar J; Kombo N
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 37(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 33825672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in Racial and Ethnic Diversity of Ophthalmology Residents and Residency Applicants.
    Aguwa UT; Srikumaran D; Canner J; Knight OJ; Scott AW; Green L; Woreta F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 240():260-264. PubMed ID: 35288067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.