These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35965729)
1. Marginal Fit of Temporary Restorations Fabricated by the Conventional Chairside Method, 3D Printing, and Milling. Mohajeri M; Khazaei S; Vafaee F; Firouz F; Ghorbani Gholiabad S; Shisheian A Front Dent; 2021; 18():31. PubMed ID: 35965729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of marginal and internal adaptation of provisional polymethyl methacrylate restorations fabricated by two three-dimensional printers: An Hasanzade M; Zabandan D; Mosaddad SA; Habibzadeh S Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():87. PubMed ID: 37810446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal fit of 3-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures: Influence of pattern fabrication method and repeated porcelain firings. Giti R; Farrahi P PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0301799. PubMed ID: 38625846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal and internal fit of provisional crowns fabricated using 3D printing technology. Chaturvedi S; Alqahtani NM; Addas MK; Alfarsi MA Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(6):635-642. PubMed ID: 32280071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach. Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of digitizing techniques on the fit of implant-retained crowns with different antirotational abutment features. Aktas G; Özcan N; Aydin DH; Şahin E; Akça K J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 24360015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the marginal accuracy of metal copings fabricated by 3D-printed resin and milled polymethyl methacrylate - An Arora O; Ahmed N; Maiti S J Adv Pharm Technol Res; 2022 Nov; 13(Suppl 1):S238-S242. PubMed ID: 36643161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of fabrication method on the marginal fit of temporary restorations. Rodrigues TCM; Resende CCD; Moura GF; Santos FHPC; Mendonça G; Zancope K; Neves FD Braz Oral Res; 2024; 38():e063. PubMed ID: 39016369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal gap and fracture resistance of implant-supported 3D-printed definitive composite crowns: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Okutan Y J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104216. PubMed ID: 35803388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the accuracy of resin-composite crowns fabricated by three-dimensional printing and milling methods. Kakinuma H; Izumita K; Yoda N; Egusa H; Sasaki K Dent Mater J; 2022 Nov; 41(6):808-815. PubMed ID: 35793943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of thermomechanical aging on marginal gap of CAD-CAM and conventional interim restorations. Angwarawong T; Reeponmaha T; Angwaravong O J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):566.e1-566.e6. PubMed ID: 32624223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs. Alharbi N; Alharbi S; Cuijpers VMJI; Osman RB; Wismeijer D J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 29032176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fit of anterior restorations made of 3D-printed and milled zirconia: An in-vitro study. Rues S; Zehender N; Zenthöfer A; Bömicke W; Herpel C; Ilani A; Erber R; Roser C; Lux CJ; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104415. PubMed ID: 36640843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Different Wax Pattern Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Customized Lithium Disilicate Implant Abutments. Taha D; Nour M; Zohdy M; El-Etreby A; Hamdy A; Salah T J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1018-1023. PubMed ID: 31573716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In-vitro performance of CAD/CAM-fabricated implant-supported temporary crowns. Rosentritt M; Raab P; Hahnel S; Stöckle M; Preis V Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2581-2587. PubMed ID: 28110407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fit and Strength of a Three-Unit Temporary Prosthesis Made by Different Manufacturing Techniques: An In Vitro Study. D'haese R; Coopman R; Vrombaut T; de Bruyn H; Vadenweghe S Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 37222543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of marginal fit and axial wall contour for lithium disilicate crowns fabricated using three digital workflows. Sadid-Zadeh R; Katsavochristou A; Squires T; Simon M J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):121-127. PubMed ID: 31027956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D-printed versus conventionally milled zirconia for dental clinical applications: Trueness, precision, accuracy, biological and esthetic aspects. Alghauli M; Alqutaibi AY; Wille S; Kern M J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104925. PubMed ID: 38471580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods. Yildirim B J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]