These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35965729)

  • 21. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer.
    Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Akhlaghian M; Pardis S; Mir N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 31672421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the internal fit of metal crowns fabricated by traditional casting, computer numerical control milling, and three-dimensional printing.
    Chou WT; Chuang CC; Wang YB; Chiu HC
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257158. PubMed ID: 34529710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of design software program and manufacturing method on the marginal and internal adaptation of esthetic crowns for primary teeth: A microcomputed tomography evaluation.
    Aktaş N; Bani M; Ocak M; Bankoğlu Güngör M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):519.e1-519.e9. PubMed ID: 38195256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 3D printing and milling accuracy influence full-contour zirconia crown adaptation.
    Camargo B; Willems E; Jacobs W; Van Landuyt K; Peumans M; Zhang F; Vleugels J; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2022 Dec; 38(12):1963-1976. PubMed ID: 36411148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison between direct chairside and digitally fabricated temporary crowns.
    Abdullah AO; Pollington S; Liu Y
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Nov; 37(6):957-963. PubMed ID: 30135337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal Adaptation of Provisional CAD/CAM Restorations Fabricated Using Various Simulated Digital Cement Space Settings.
    Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B; Şeker E; Shah K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1064-1069. PubMed ID: 30231093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of marginal fit of single implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns prepared by using presintered metal blocks.
    Pasali B; Sarac D; Kaleli N; Sarac YS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):257-262. PubMed ID: 28545869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal fit of milled versus different 3D-printed materials for provisional fixed dental prostheses: an
    Igreţ A; Rotar RN; Ille C; Topală F; Jivănescu A
    Med Pharm Rep; 2023 Jul; 96(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 37577020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of marginal fit of CAD/CAM restorations fabricated through cone beam computerized tomography and laboratory scanner data.
    Şeker E; Ozcelik TB; Rathi N; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 26518986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations.
    Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An
    Sarda AS; Bedia SV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage of chairside moulded, 3D-printed and milled provisional restorations using a curve-fit approach.
    Reyes K; Plaksina P; Barazanchi A; Vuuren WJV; Waddell JN; Li KC
    Braz Dent J; 2023; 34(6):91-99. PubMed ID: 38133096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of Different Wax Pattern Manufacturing Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns.
    Alshehri HA; Altaweel SM; Alshaibani R; Alahmari EA; Alotaibi HN; Alfouzan AF; Labban N
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Jul; 15(14):. PubMed ID: 35888241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro assessment of the marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with different methods.
    Park JY; Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Bae SY; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):536-542. PubMed ID: 27174406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Over Reverse Tapered Preparations.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Yatani H; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e477-e484. PubMed ID: 29194841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Marginal fit of endocrowns fabricated by three-dimensional printing and the conventional method: An
    Jamshidi S; Darabi R; Azarian M; Mahabadi M; Nilli M
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():53. PubMed ID: 37304421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.