These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35965729)

  • 41. Failure load of milled, 3D-printed, and conventional chairside-dispensed interim 3-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Henderson JY; Korioth TVP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):275.e1-275.e7. PubMed ID: 34895902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of cement film thickness of veneers and crowns made with conventional and 3D printed provisional materials.
    Sampaio CS; Niemann KD; Schweitzer DD; Hirata R; Atria PJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 32937028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of three-unit implant-supported fixed prosthetic substructures fabricated using CAD/CAM systems.
    Kayikci O; Ates SM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 34331593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Marginal and Internal Gap of Metal Copings Fabricated Using Three Types of Resin Patterns with Subtractive and Additive Technology: An In Vitro Comparison.
    Addugala H; Venugopal VN; Rengasamy S; Yadalam PK; Albar NH; Alamoudi A; Bahammam SA; Zidane B; Bahammam HA; Bhandi S; Shrivastava D; Srivastava KC; Patil S
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Sep; 15(18):. PubMed ID: 36143710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D-printing technique.
    Hasanzade M; Yaghoobi N; Nematollahi P; Ghazanfari R
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2023 Oct; 9(5):832-839. PubMed ID: 37386767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
    Ghodsi S; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Rostami M; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
    Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed provisional crowns according to build directions.
    Ryu JE; Kim YL; Kong HJ; Chang HS; Jung JH
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 12(4):225-232. PubMed ID: 32879713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of three digital workflows for implant abutment and crown fabrication using a digital measuring technique.
    Zeller S; Guichet D; Kontogiorgos E; Nagy WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 30396709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of fabrication methods (conventional, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing milling, three-dimensional printing) and material type on the fracture strength of provisional restorations.
    AhmadAbadi MN; Goharifar A; Mahabadi M
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():86. PubMed ID: 37674576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center.
    Meirowitz A; Bitterman Y; Levy S; Mijiritsky E; Dolev E
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):103. PubMed ID: 31196041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
    de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing.
    Wang W; Yu H; Liu Y; Jiang X; Gao B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):285-291. PubMed ID: 30017167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparative evaluation of vertical marginal fit of provisional crowns fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technique and direct (intraoral technique) and flexural strength of the materials: An
    Dureja I; Yadav B; Malhotra P; Dabas N; Bhargava A; Pahwa R
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(4):314-320. PubMed ID: 30449959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Chairside fabrication of provisional crowns on FDM 3D-printed PVA model.
    Muta S; Ikeda M; Nikaido T; Sayed M; Sadr A; Suzuki T; Tagami J
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Oct; 64(4):401-407. PubMed ID: 32063536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.