156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35965743)
21. Mitigating inherent noise in Monte Carlo dose distributions using dilated U-Net.
Javaid U; Souris K; Dasnoy D; Huang S; Lee JA
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5790-5798. PubMed ID: 31600829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development of an extended Macro Monte Carlo method for efficient and accurate dose calculation in magnetic fields.
Kueng R; Guyer G; Volken W; Frei D; Stabel F; Stampanoni MFM; Manser P; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6519-6530. PubMed ID: 33075168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Very high-energy electron dose calculation using the Fermi-Eyges theory of multiple scattering and a simplified pencil beam model.
Ronga MG; Deut U; Bonfrate A; De Marzi L
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):8009-8022. PubMed ID: 37730956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A novel multichannel deep learning model for fast denoising of Monte Carlo dose calculations: preclinical applications.
van Dijk RHW; Staut N; Wolfs CJA; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Aug; 67(16):. PubMed ID: 35938467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. SU-E-T-541: Dose Calculation Algorithm for External Neutron Radiotherapy Based on Pencil Beam Method.
Moiseev A; Klimanov V
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part18):3830. PubMed ID: 28518510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An algorithm to assess the need for clinical Monte Carlo dose calculation for small proton therapy fields based on quantification of tissue heterogeneity.
Bueno M; Paganetti H; Duch MA; Schuemann J
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081704. PubMed ID: 23927301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of proton dose calculation algorithms on the interplay effect in PBS proton based SBRT lung plans.
Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 May; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 34029212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo code (gPMC) for proton radiation therapy: clinical cases study.
Giantsoudi D; Schuemann J; Jia X; Dowdell S; Jiang S; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(6):2257-69. PubMed ID: 25715661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is an analytical dose engine sufficient for intensity modulated proton therapy in lung cancer?
Teoh S; Fiorini F; George B; Vallis KA; Van den Heuvel F
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190583. PubMed ID: 31696729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of CBCT scatter correction using deep convolutional neural networks for head and neck adaptive proton therapy.
Lalonde A; Winey B; Verburg J; Paganetti H; Sharp GC
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):. PubMed ID: 32580174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue heterogeneities corrections in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients using stereotactic radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; McClinton C; Sood S; Badkul R; Saleh H; Jiang H; Lominska C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 27074489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Real-time, acquisition parameter-free voxel-wise patient-specific Monte Carlo dose reconstruction in whole-body CT scanning using deep neural networks.
Salimi Y; Akhavanallaf A; Mansouri Z; Shiri I; Zaidi H
Eur Radiol; 2023 Dec; 33(12):9411-9424. PubMed ID: 37368113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Convolution neural network toward Monte Carlo photon dose calculation in radiation therapy.
Zhang B; Liu X; Chen L; Zhu J
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):1248-1261. PubMed ID: 34897703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction of dose deposition matrix using voxel features driven machine learning approach.
Jiao S; Zhao X; Yao S
Br J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 96(1145):20220373. PubMed ID: 36856129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pareto front analysis of 6 and 15 MV dynamic IMRT for lung cancer using pencil beam, AAA and Monte Carlo.
Ottosson RO; Karlsson A; Behrens CF
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4521-33. PubMed ID: 20668346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
