These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35966775)

  • 1. Age-Related Changes in Interaural-Level-Difference-Based Across-Frequency Binaural Interference.
    Goupell MJ
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2022; 14():887401. PubMed ID: 35966775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of target and interferer frequency on across-frequency binaural interference of interaural-level-difference sensitivity.
    Rosen B; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):924. PubMed ID: 35232088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a Method for Determining Binaural Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure (TFS-AF Test) for Older Listeners With Normal and Impaired Low-Frequency Hearing.
    Füllgrabe C; Moore BCJ
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517737230. PubMed ID: 29090641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences.
    Heller LM; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):310-9. PubMed ID: 20649226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues Induced by Lateralization Training.
    Klingel M; Kopčo N; Laback B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 22(5):551-566. PubMed ID: 33959826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relating age and hearing loss to monaural, bilateral, and binaural temporal sensitivity.
    Gallun FJ; McMillan GP; Molis MR; Kampel SD; Dann SM; Konrad-Martin DL
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():172. PubMed ID: 25009458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
    Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Klingel M; Laback B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):119-136. PubMed ID: 34812980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Across-channel interaural-level-difference processing demonstrates frequency dependence.
    Goupell MJ; Stakhovskaya OA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):645. PubMed ID: 29495743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spectrotemporal weighting of binaural cues: Effects of a diotic interferer on discrimination of dynamic interaural differences.
    Bibee JM; Stecker GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2584. PubMed ID: 27794286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on interaural discrimination and virtual localization.
    Smith-Olinde L; Koehnke J; Besing J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2084-99. PubMed ID: 9566330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Relationship Between Interaural Insertion-Depth Differences, Scalar Location, and Interaural Time-Difference Processing in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Cleary M; Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble J; Kolberg E; Jensen KK; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221129165. PubMed ID: 36379607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial Hearing by Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users With Temporal Fine-Structure Processing.
    Ausili SA; Agterberg MJH; Engel A; Voelter C; Thomas JP; Brill S; Snik AFM; Dazert S; Van Opstal AJ; Mylanus EAM
    Front Neurol; 2020; 11():915. PubMed ID: 33101160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
    Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal weighting of binaural information at low frequencies: Discrimination of dynamic interaural time and level differences.
    Diedesch AC; Stecker GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 26233013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioural sensitivity to binaural spatial cues in ferrets: evidence for plasticity in the duplex theory of sound localization.
    Keating P; Nodal FR; King AJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 39(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 24256073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.