These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35966775)

  • 21. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e22-e38. PubMed ID: 27579987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Behavioural sensitivity to binaural spatial cues in ferrets: evidence for plasticity in the duplex theory of sound localization.
    Keating P; Nodal FR; King AJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 39(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 24256073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Binaural-cue Weighting and Training-Induced Reweighting Across Frequencies.
    Klingel M; Laback B
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221104872. PubMed ID: 35791626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Age-Related Deficits in Electrophysiological and Behavioral Measures of Binaural Temporal Processing.
    Koerner TK; Muralimanohar RK; Gallun FJ; Billings CJ
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():578566. PubMed ID: 33192263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of dynamic-range compression on the spatial attributes of sounds in normal-hearing listeners.
    Wiggins IM; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):399-410. PubMed ID: 22246139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Goupell MJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):110-123. PubMed ID: 28787316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Recipients with Normal Hearing in the Contralateral Ear: Effects of Spectral Content and Duration of Listening Experience.
    Dillon MT; Rooth MA; Canfarotta MW; Richter ME; Thompson NJ; Brown KD
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(6):437-448. PubMed ID: 35439753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relating interaural difference sensitivities for several parameters measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Spencer NJ; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1783. PubMed ID: 27914394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Binaural Interference and the Effects of Age and Hearing Loss.
    Mussoi BSS; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28054908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differing Bilateral Benefits for Spatial Release From Masking and Sound Localization Accuracy Using Bone Conduction Devices.
    Denanto FM; Wales J; Tideholm B; Asp F
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1708-1720. PubMed ID: 35588503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contribution of monaural and binaural cues to sound localization in listeners with acquired unilateral conductive hearing loss: improved directional hearing with a bone-conduction device.
    Agterberg MJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Van Wanrooij MM; Van Opstal AJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 286(1-2):9-18. PubMed ID: 22616091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of interaural delay, center frequency, and no more than "slight" hearing loss on precision of binaural processing: Empirical data and quantitative modeling.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):292. PubMed ID: 30075692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.
    Eddins AC; Ozmeral EJ; Eddins DA
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():79-89. PubMed ID: 29759684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
    Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Single-sided deafness and directional hearing: contribution of spectral cues and high-frequency hearing loss in the hearing ear.
    Agterberg MJ; Hol MK; Van Wanrooij MM; Van Opstal AJ; Snik AF
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():188. PubMed ID: 25071433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.
    Zaleski-King A; Goupell MJ; Barac-Cikoja D; Bakke M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):659-671. PubMed ID: 30417825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Anderson SR; Easter K; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3232. PubMed ID: 31795662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.