135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35967663)
1. Is good more alike than bad? Positive-negative asymmetry in the differentiation between options. A study on the evaluation of fictitious political profiles.
Jablonska M; Falkowski A; Mackiewicz R
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():923027. PubMed ID: 35967663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positive-Negative Asymmetry in the Evaluations of Political Candidates. The Role of Features of Similarity and Affect in Voter Behavior.
Falkowski A; Jabłońska M
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():213. PubMed ID: 29535663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Similarity judgements: the comparison of normative predictions and subjective evaluations - A study of the ratio model of similarity in social context.
Jabłońska MZ; Falkowski A; Mackiewicz R
Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1335707. PubMed ID: 38817837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad.
Koch A; Alves H; Krüger T; Unkelbach C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1171-92. PubMed ID: 26866655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The differential similarity of positive and negative information - an affect-induced processing outcome?
Alves H; Koch A; Unkelbach C
Cogn Emot; 2019 Sep; 33(6):1224-1238. PubMed ID: 30475089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intention matters to make you (im)moral: Positive-negative asymmetry in moral character evaluations.
Hirozawa PY; Karasawa M; Matsuo A
J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jul; 160(4):401-415. PubMed ID: 31423929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Emotional processes in schizophrenia: investigation of the evaluative component].
Sander D; Koenig O; Georgieff N; Terra JL; Franck N
Encephale; 2005; 31(6 Pt 1):672-82. PubMed ID: 16462686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valence asymmetries in attitude ambivalence.
Snyder AI; Tormala ZL
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Apr; 112(4):555-576. PubMed ID: 28301187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Social evaluations under conflict: negative judgments of conflicting information are easier than positive judgments.
Nohlen HU; van Harreveld F; Cunningham WA
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 14(7):709-718. PubMed ID: 31269199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Me as good and me as bad: Priming the self triggers positive and negative implicit evaluations.
Zayas V; Wang AM; McCalla JD
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Jan; 122(1):106-134. PubMed ID: 34694840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Political affiliation and employment screening decisions: The role of similarity and identification processes.
Roth PL; Thatcher JB; Bobko P; Matthews KD; Ellingson JE; Goldberg CB
J Appl Psychol; 2020 May; 105(5):472-486. PubMed ID: 31535874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A density explanation of valence asymmetries in recognition memory.
Alves H; Unkelbach C; Burghardt J; Koch AS; Krüger T; Becker VD
Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):896-909. PubMed ID: 25772462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Losing on all fronts: the effects of negative versus positive person-based campaigns on implicit and explicit evaluations of political candidates.
Carraro L; Gawronski B; Castelli L
Br J Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 49(Pt 3):453-70. PubMed ID: 19719903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Study of the categorization process among patients with eating disorders: a new cognitive approach to psychopathology].
Urdapilleta I; Mirabel-Sarron C; Meunier JM; Richard JF
Encephale; 2005; 31(1 Pt 1):82-91. PubMed ID: 15971644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From rarity to evaluative extremity: effects of prevalence information on evaluations of positive and negative characteristics.
Ditto PH; Jemmott JB
J Pers Soc Psychol; 1989 Jul; 57(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 2754601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cognitive-behavioral models of social anxiety disorder.
Roth DA; Heimberg RG
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2001 Dec; 24(4):753-71. PubMed ID: 11723631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The age-related positivity effect: forgetting the negative and/or remembering the positive? An inter-task study].
Laulan P; Catheline G; Mayo W; Robert C; Mathey S
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil; 2020 Dec; 18(4):437-447. PubMed ID: 33289488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why Good Is More Alike Than Bad: Processing Implications.
Alves H; Koch A; Unkelbach C
Trends Cogn Sci; 2017 Feb; 21(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 28063663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "Political affiliation and employment screening decisions: The role of similarity and identification processes": Correction to Roth et al. (2020).
J Appl Psychol; 2020 Oct; 105(10):1087. PubMed ID: 32940483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
