These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35968027)

  • 1. Remedying the Metamemory Expectancy Illusion in Source Monitoring: Are there Effects on Restudy Choices and Source Memory?
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ; Hey CV
    Metacogn Learn; 2023; 18(1):55-80. PubMed ID: 35968027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The metamemory expectancy illusion in source monitoring affects metamemory control and memory.
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ
    Cognition; 2021 Jan; 206():104468. PubMed ID: 33160240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Delaying metamemory judgments corrects the expectancy illusion in source monitoring: The role of fluency and belief.
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ; Hey CV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):975-1000. PubMed ID: 34726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Memory and metamemory for social interactions: Evidence for a metamemory expectancy illusion.
    Mieth L; Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bell R
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jan; 49(1):14-31. PubMed ID: 32734524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metacognitive differentiation of item memory and source memory in schema-based source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):743-765. PubMed ID: 36521154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does delaying judgments of learning really improve the efficacy of study decisions? Not so much.
    Kimball DR; Smith TA; Muntean WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):923-54. PubMed ID: 22250913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do delayed judgements of learning reduce metamemory illusions? A meta-analysis.
    Luna K; Martín-Luengo B; Albuquerque PB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1626-1636. PubMed ID: 28856962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.
    Yang C; Sun B; Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):384-397. PubMed ID: 29164524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control.
    Finn B
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jun; 36(4):813-21. PubMed ID: 18604963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text.
    Little JL; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 25135813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feeling of knowing and restudy choices.
    Hanczakowski M; Zawadzka K; Cockcroft-McKay C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1617-22. PubMed ID: 24659050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feeling-of-knowing experiences breed curiosity.
    Brooks G; Yang H; Köhler S
    Memory; 2021 Feb; 29(2):153-167. PubMed ID: 33480318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of acute exercise intensity on source episodic memory and metamemory accuracy.
    Loprinzi P; Rigdon B; Javadi AH; Kelemen WL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Dec; 75(12):2232-2243. PubMed ID: 34911407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inconsistency effects in source memory and compensatory schema-consistent guessing.
    Küppers V; Bayen UJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2042-59. PubMed ID: 24628718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictions of recall and study strategy decisions after diffuse brain injury.
    Kennedy MR; Carney E; Peters SM
    Brain Inj; 2003 Dec; 17(12):1043-64. PubMed ID: 14555364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there more to metamemory? An argument for two specialized monitoring abilities.
    McDonough IM; Enam T; Kraemer KR; Eakin DK; Kim M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1657-1667. PubMed ID: 33948916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study of metamemory in patients with chronic alcoholism using a feeling-of-knowing episodic memory task.
    Le Berre AP; Pinon K; Vabret F; Pitel AL; Allain P; Eustache F; Beaunieux H
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2010 Nov; 34(11):1888-98. PubMed ID: 20735374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice?
    Toppino TC; Heslin KA; Curley TM; Jackiewicz MK; Flowers CS; Phelan HA
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1423-1435. PubMed ID: 33770397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
    McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.