These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35968123)

  • 1. Motif models proposing independent and interdependent impacts of nucleotides are related to high and low affinity transcription factor binding sites in Arabidopsis.
    Tsukanov AV; Mironova VV; Levitsky VG
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():938545. PubMed ID: 35968123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of alternative de novo motif recognition models for analysis of structural heterogeneity of transcription factor binding sites: a case study of FOXA2 binding sites.
    Tsukanov AV; Levitsky VG; Merkulova TI
    Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genet Selektsii; 2021 Feb; 25(1):7. PubMed ID: 34547062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of experimentally verified transcription factor binding sites models for computational analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
    Levitsky VG; Kulakovskiy IV; Ershov NI; Oshchepkov DY; Makeev VJ; Hodgman TC; Merkulova TI
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):80. PubMed ID: 24472686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hidden heterogeneity of transcription factor binding sites: A case study of SF-1.
    Levitsky VG; Oshchepkov DY; Klimova NV; Ignatieva EV; Vasiliev GV; Merkulov VM; Merkulova TI
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Oct; 64():19-32. PubMed ID: 27235721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.
    Tahara S; Tsuchiya T; Matsumoto H; Ozaki H
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):597. PubMed ID: 37805453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferring intra-motif dependencies of DNA binding sites from ChIP-seq data.
    Eggeling R; Roos T; Myllymäki P; Grosse I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():375. PubMed ID: 26552868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective transcription factor binding site prediction using a combination of optimization, a genetic algorithm and discriminant analysis to capture distant interactions.
    Levitsky VG; Ignatieva EV; Ananko EA; Turnaev II; Merkulova TI; Kolchanov NA; Hodgman TC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 8():481. PubMed ID: 18093302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-targeted transcription factors motifs are a systemic component of ChIP-seq datasets.
    Worsley Hunt R; Wasserman WW
    Genome Biol; 2014 Jul; 15(7):412. PubMed ID: 25070602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichment.
    Worsley Hunt R; Mathelier A; Del Peso L; Wasserman WW
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):472. PubMed ID: 24927817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variable structure motifs for transcription factor binding sites.
    Reid JE; Evans KJ; Dyer N; Wernisch L; Ott S
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Jan; 11():30. PubMed ID: 20074339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimally choosing PWM motif databases and sequence scanning approaches based on ChIP-seq data.
    Dabrowski M; Dojer N; Krystkowiak I; Kaminska B; Wilczynski B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():140. PubMed ID: 25927199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of discriminative motif optimization using matrix and DNA shape-based models.
    Ruan S; Stormo GD
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 29510689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets.
    Machanick P; Bailey TL
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 27(12):1696-7. PubMed ID: 21486936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MOCCS: Clarifying DNA-binding motif ambiguity using ChIP-Seq data.
    Ozaki H; Iwasaki W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 63():62-72. PubMed ID: 26971251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistics of protein-DNA binding and the total number of binding sites for a transcription factor in the mammalian genome.
    Kuznetsov VA; Singh O; Jenjaroenpun P
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Feb; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 20158869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Widespread effects of DNA methylation and intra-motif dependencies revealed by novel transcription factor binding models.
    Grau J; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Oct; 51(18):e95. PubMed ID: 37650641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. abc4pwm: affinity based clustering for position weight matrices in applications of DNA sequence analysis.
    Ali O; Farooq A; Yang M; Jin VX; Bjørås M; Wang J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):83. PubMed ID: 35240993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insights gained from a comprehensive all-against-all transcription factor binding motif benchmarking study.
    Ambrosini G; Vorontsov I; Penzar D; Groux R; Fornes O; Nikolaeva DD; Ballester B; Grau J; Grosse I; Makeev V; Kulakovskiy I; Bucher P
    Genome Biol; 2020 May; 21(1):114. PubMed ID: 32393327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymmetric Conservation within Pairs of Co-Occurred Motifs Mediates Weak Direct Binding of Transcription Factors in ChIP-Seq Data.
    Levitsky V; Oshchepkov D; Zemlyanskaya E; Merkulova T
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 32825662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From binding motifs in ChIP-Seq data to improved models of transcription factor binding sites.
    Kulakovskiy I; Levitsky V; Oshchepkov D; Bryzgalov L; Vorontsov I; Makeev V
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2013 Feb; 11(1):1340004. PubMed ID: 23427986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.