These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35968271)

  • 1. Nonpalpable implant removals at centre of experience in France: a cohort study.
    Chene G; Akl P; Gjorgjievska-Delov A; Cerruto E; Moret S; Nohuz E
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2024 Aug; 29(4):163-170. PubMed ID: 38813779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The association between BMI and continuity of etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing implant.
    Mohr-Sasson A; Dalal L; Bhalwal A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38712353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reversible median nerve neuropathy and local muscle irritation resulting from blind removal attempts of etonogestrel contraceptive implant: a case report.
    Fungtammasan S; Sinthuchai N; Pataradool K; Jaisamrarn U; Santibenchakul S
    Contracept Reprod Med; 2023 Dec; 8(1):57. PubMed ID: 38037175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Etonogestrel Implant-To Leave or Stay: A Case Series.
    Thew M
    Glob Pediatr Health; 2017; 4():2333794X17738844. PubMed ID: 29204458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Migration of a Contraceptive Subdermal Device Into the Lung.
    Enabi J; Al-Ayyubi R; Amador P; Herrera A; Deepika D
    Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48179. PubMed ID: 38046752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pregnancies associated with etonogestrel implants in the UK: comparison of two 5-year reporting periods.
    Rowlands S; Cornforth E; Harrison-Woolrych M
    BMJ Sex Reprod Health; 2019 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 31601619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Letter to the Editor: Subdermal contraceptive implant-related neuropathy of the upper limb: A time for change.
    Curran S; Heffernan E; Connolly S; Levins K; Cronin K; Dolan R
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Jan; 88():55-56. PubMed ID: 37952437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contraceptive Implant Migration and Removal by Interventional Radiology.
    Zhang S; Batur P; Martin C; Rochon PJ
    Semin Intervent Radiol; 2018 Mar; 35(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 29628612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection for removal of precariously sited contraceptive implants.
    Pillai M
    BMJ Sex Reprod Health; 2018 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 29972354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hydrodissection in the removal of deeply located etonogestrel implants.
    Menon K
    BMJ Sex Reprod Health; 2018 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 30504217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New insertion site for Nexplanon insertion.
    Walling MR
    BMJ Sex Reprod Health; 2019 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 31582410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subfascial-located contraceptive devices requiring surgical removal.
    Hellwinkel JE; Konigsberg MW; Oviedo J; Castaño PM; Kadiyala RK
    Contracept Reprod Med; 2021 May; 6(1):13. PubMed ID: 33934717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extended use up to 5 years of the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal contraceptive implant: comparison to levonorgestrel-releasing subdermal implant.
    Ali M; Akin A; Bahamondes L; Brache V; Habib N; Landoulsi S; Hubacher D;
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2491-2498. PubMed ID: 27671673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with deep contraceptive implant removals compared to superficial removals.
    Kendall PD; Bresnitz W; Huang J; Sheeder J; Lazorwitz A
    Contraception; 2024 May; ():110486. PubMed ID: 38754757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Difficult implant removals.
    Voedisch A; Hugin M
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 29(6):449-457. PubMed ID: 28938375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hormonal implants: contraception for a new century.
    Darney PD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 170(5 Pt 2):1536-43. PubMed ID: 8178903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics of Patients Requiring Surgical Removal of Subdermal Contraceptive Implants: A Case-Control Study.
    Katabi L; Stevens E; Ascha M; Arora K
    Open Access J Contracept; 2022; 13():111-119. PubMed ID: 35968271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.