These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35968391)

  • 1. EEG response in humans for frequency-tagged anticorrelated random-dot stereograms: Increased coherency and alpha oscillations.
    Derzsi Z
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():909225. PubMed ID: 35968391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reversed Depth in Anticorrelated Random-Dot Stereograms and the Central-Peripheral Difference in Visual Inference.
    Zhaoping L; Ackermann J
    Perception; 2018 Jan; ():301006618758571. PubMed ID: 29514559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disparity detection in anticorrelated stereograms.
    Cumming BG; Shapiro SE; Parker AJ
    Perception; 1998; 27(11):1367-77. PubMed ID: 10505181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: effects of spatial density and interocular delay.
    Cogan AI; Lomakin AJ; Rossi AF
    Vision Res; 1993 Sep; 33(14):1959-75. PubMed ID: 8249313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Single Mechanism Can Account for Human Perception of Depth in Mixed Correlation Random Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Cumming BG; Read JC
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 May; 12(5):e1004906. PubMed ID: 27196696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the apparent collapse of stereopsis in random-dot-stereograms at isoluminance.
    Kingdom FA; Simmons DR; Rainville S
    Vision Res; 1999 Jun; 39(12):2127-41. PubMed ID: 10343795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal Approach for Signal Detection in Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials in Humans Using Single-Channel EEG and Stereoscopic Stimuli.
    Derzsi Z
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():600543. PubMed ID: 33679294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning to see random-dot stereograms.
    O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ
    Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A relative frame of reference underlies reversed depth perception in anticorrelated random-dot stereograms.
    Aoki SC; Shiozaki HM; Fujita I
    J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):17. PubMed ID: 29071354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rejection of false matches for binocular correspondence in macaque visual cortical area V4.
    Tanabe S; Umeda K; Fujita I
    J Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 24(37):8170-80. PubMed ID: 15371518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unconscious adaptation: a new illusion of depth induced by stimulus features without depth.
    Hayashi R; Miyawaki Y; Maeda T; Tachi S
    Vision Res; 2003 Dec; 43(26):2773-82. PubMed ID: 14568094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception.
    Cumming BG; Parker AJ
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):280-3. PubMed ID: 9305841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-matching: a modified cross-correlation underlying threshold energy model and match-based depth perception.
    Doi T; Fujita I
    Front Comput Neurosci; 2014; 8():127. PubMed ID: 25360107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Depth perception and amplitude of VEPs for variations of dot density in static random dot stereograms].
    Iizuka K
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Aug; 96(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 1519516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortical Processing of Binaural Cues as Shown by EEG Responses to Random-Chord Stereograms.
    Pöntynen H; Salminen N
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 34904205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptation to Binocular Anticorrelation Results in Increased Neural Excitability.
    Rideaux R; Michael E; Welchman AE
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 32(1):100-110. PubMed ID: 31560264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Form and depth in global stereopsis.
    Chung CS; Berbaum K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):258-75. PubMed ID: 6232344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast-reversed binocular dot-pairs in random-dot stereograms for depth perception in central visual field: Probing the dynamics of feedforward-feedback processes in visual inference.
    Zhaoping L
    Vision Res; 2021 Sep; 186():124-139. PubMed ID: 34091397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effects on depth perception and pattern recognition in random dot stereograms by changing the matrix dot density].
    Pressmar SB; Haase W
    Ophthalmologe; 2001 Oct; 98(10):955-9. PubMed ID: 11699317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.