These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35968391)

  • 21. Can random-dot stereograms serve as a model for the perception of depth in relation to real three-dimensional objects?
    Bishop PO
    Vision Res; 1996 May; 36(10):1473-7. PubMed ID: 8762764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Read JC; Cumming BG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(34):8967-76. PubMed ID: 27559177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enhancing Motion-In-Depth Perception of Random-Dot Stereograms.
    Zhang D; Nourrit V; De Bougrenet de la Tocnaye JL
    Perception; 2018 Jul; 47(7):722-734. PubMed ID: 29914316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Disparity-tuning characteristics of neuronal responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms in macaque visual area V4.
    Tanabe S; Doi T; Umeda K; Fujita I
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct; 94(4):2683-99. PubMed ID: 16000525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accommodation to large disparity stereograms.
    Davis H; Buckley D; Jacobs RE; Brennand DA; Frisby JP
    J AAPOS; 2002 Dec; 6(6):377-84. PubMed ID: 12506280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Single image random dot stereogram: principles and clinical implications.
    Lee DY; Ireland D
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Apr; 67(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 8888831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Depth perception not found in human observers for static or dynamic anti-correlated random dot stereograms.
    Hibbard PB; Scott-Brown KC; Haigh EC; Adrain M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84087. PubMed ID: 24416195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Measuring the depth induced by an opposite-luminance (but not anticorrelated) stereogram.
    Howe PD; Watanabe T
    Perception; 2003; 32(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 12785481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Disparity Sensitivity and Binocular Integration in Mouse Visual Cortex Areas.
    La Chioma A; Bonhoeffer T; Hübener M
    J Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 40(46):8883-8899. PubMed ID: 33051348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The analysis of disparity evoked potentials by a new form of static random-dot stereograms.
    Hou C; Zhang X; Fang Q; Shou T; Zeng L; Yan M; Zhou Y; Hu B; Li P
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 1995 Mar; 11(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 8575607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Changes in neural complexity during the perception of 3D images using random dot stereograms.
    Burgess AP; Rehman J; Williams JD
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Apr; 48(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 12694899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ecologically invalid monocular texture leads to longer perceptual latencies in random-dot stereograms.
    Grove PM; Ono H
    Perception; 1999; 28(5):627-39. PubMed ID: 10664759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Topographical representation of binocular depth in the human visual cortex using fMRI.
    Bridge H; Parker AJ
    J Vis; 2007 Dec; 7(14):15.1-14. PubMed ID: 18217810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stereo transparency in ambiguous stereograms generated by overlapping two identical dot patterns.
    Watanabe O
    J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):24.1-9. PubMed ID: 20053115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multivoxel pattern selectivity for perceptually relevant binocular disparities in the human brain.
    Preston TJ; Li S; Kourtzi Z; Welchman AE
    J Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 28(44):11315-27. PubMed ID: 18971473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceptual latency and complex random-dot stereograms.
    Bradshaw MF; Rogers BJ; De Bruyn B
    Perception; 1995; 24(7):749-59. PubMed ID: 8710438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stereopsis with persisting and dynamic textures.
    Allison RS; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(28):3823-7. PubMed ID: 11090674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms.
    Erkelens CJ; Collewijn H
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(4):583-8. PubMed ID: 4060612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of dot size in random-dot stereograms on the results of stereoacuity measurements.
    Zhao L; Wu H
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):253. PubMed ID: 32580763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accommodation and pupil responses to random-dot stereograms.
    Suryakumar R; Allison R
    J Optom; 2016; 9(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25891121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.