These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35969715)

  • 1. Can Crossover and Altered Magnitude Estimation in Neglect Be Explained by Contextual Effects?
    Jewell GR; Salem J; Hartley S; Vezey E; Mark VW; Mennemeier MS
    Adv Neurol Neurosci Res; 2022; 3():. PubMed ID: 35969715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.
    Mennemeier M; Pierce CA; Chatterjee A; Anderson B; Jewell G; Dowler R; Woods AJ; Glenn T; Mark VW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1194-211. PubMed ID: 16197678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossover is not a consequence of neglect: a test of the orientation/estimation hypothesis.
    Mennemeier M; Vezey E; Lamar M; Jewell G
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2002 Jan; 8(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 11843067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crossover by line length and spatial location.
    Mennemeier M; Rapcsak SZ; Pierce C; Vezey E
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):412-22. PubMed ID: 11748897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Context and crossover in unilateral neglect.
    Ricci R; Chatterjee A
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(11):1138-43. PubMed ID: 11527550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image of a line is not shrunk but neglected. Absence of crossover in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Nakano N; Seki K; Nishida Y; Hayashi K
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 14644110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A search for the optimal stimulus.
    Mennemeier M; Rapcsak SZ; Dillon M; Vezey E
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Aug; 37(3):439-59. PubMed ID: 9733559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Line bisection and rebisection: the crossover effect of space location.
    Wang Q; Sonoda S; Hanamura M; Okazaki H; Saitoh E
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2005 Jun; 19(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 15883353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation of the mechanisms underlying the effects of viewing distance and stimulus length on attentional asymmetries during line bisection.
    Nicholls ME; Beckman E; Churches O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1351-62. PubMed ID: 27150618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Representational bias does not affect bisection of lines with a pictorially or semantically defined top by patients with left hemispatial neglect.
    Toth C; Kirk A
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Nov; 50(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 12464187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
    Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Line versus representational bisections in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Seki K; Izawa M
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 Dec; 69(6):745-50. PubMed ID: 11080226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Line and word bisection in right-brain-damaged patients with left spatial neglect.
    Veronelli L; Vallar G; Marinelli CV; Primativo S; Arduino LS
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jan; 232(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 24146192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EEG Correlates of Preparatory Orienting, Contextual Updating, and Inhibition of Sensory Processing in Left Spatial Neglect.
    Lasaponara S; D'Onofrio M; Pinto M; Dragone A; Menicagli D; Bueti D; De Lucia M; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
    J Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 38(15):3792-3808. PubMed ID: 29555852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus context in hemineglect.
    Marshall RS; Lazar RM; Krakauer JW; Sharma R
    Brain; 1998 Oct; 121 ( Pt 10)():2003-10. PubMed ID: 9798752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagonal spatial neglect.
    Mark VW; Heilman KM
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Sep; 65(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 9728947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Hemispheric Distribution of α-Band EEG Activity During Orienting of Attention in Patients with Reduced Awareness of the Left Side of Space (Spatial Neglect).
    Lasaponara S; Pinto M; Aiello M; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(22):4332-4343. PubMed ID: 30902872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting the midpoint of sentences: The role of the left hemisphere.
    Veronelli L; Arduino LS; Biscaro V; Corbo M; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107287. PubMed ID: 31863803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.