These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35969715)

  • 21. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Setting the midpoint of sentences: The role of the left hemisphere.
    Veronelli L; Arduino LS; Biscaro V; Corbo M; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107287. PubMed ID: 31863803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The cross-over effect in unilateral neglect. Modelling detailed data in the line-bisection task.
    Monaghan P; Shillcock R
    Brain; 1998 May; 121 ( Pt 5)():907-21. PubMed ID: 9619193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. To see or not to see: the effects of visible and invisible cues on line bisection judgements in unilateral neglect.
    Mattingley JB; Pierson JM; Bradshaw JL; Phillips JG; Bradshaw JA
    Neuropsychologia; 1993 Nov; 31(11):1201-15. PubMed ID: 8107981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Influence of Focused and Sustained Spatial Attention on the Allocation of Spatial Attention.
    Lamb DG; Balavage KT; Williamson JB; Knight LA; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Jan; 25(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 30486914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The centre is not in the middle: evidence from line and word bisection.
    Arduino LS; Previtali P; Girelli L
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2140-6. PubMed ID: 20385154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When right goes left: an investigation of line bisection in a case of visual neglect.
    Marshall JC; Halligan PW
    Cortex; 1989 Sep; 25(3):503-15. PubMed ID: 2805737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Effects of Chronic Right Hemispheric Damage on the Allocation of Spatial Attention: Alterations of Accuracy and Reliability.
    Finney GR; Williamson JB; Brandon Burtis D; Drago V; Mizuno T; Jeong Y; Crucian GP; Haque S; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2015 May; 21(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 26073665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contributions of object- and space-based mechanisms to line bisection errors.
    Post RB; Caufield KJ; Welch RB
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(8):856-64. PubMed ID: 11369408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Unilateral spatial neglect in AD: significance of line bisection performance.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Seki K; Orimo S; Sodeyama N; Ozawa E; Lee EY; Takahashi M; Watabiki S; Okiyama R; Ohtake T; Hiroki M
    Neurology; 2000 Aug; 55(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 10932269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Value-driven attentional capture in neglect.
    Bourgeois A; Saj A; Vuilleumier P
    Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():260-271. PubMed ID: 30391880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hemispheric control of spatial attention.
    Reuter-Lorenz PA; Kinsbourne M; Moscovitch M
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Mar; 12(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 2340154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Representational neglect for words as revealed by bisection tasks.
    Arduino LS; Marinelli CV; Pasotti F; Ferrè ER; Bottini G
    J Neuropsychol; 2012 Mar; 6(1):43-64. PubMed ID: 22257574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tonal cues modulate line bisection performance: preliminary evidence for a new rehabilitation prospect?
    Ishihara M; Revol P; Jacquin-Courtois S; Mayet R; Rode G; Boisson D; Farnè A; Rossetti Y
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():704. PubMed ID: 24109467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cross-over, completion and confabulation in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Chatterjee A
    Brain; 1995 Apr; 118 ( Pt 2)():455-65. PubMed ID: 7735886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rightward and leftward bisection biases in spatial neglect: two sides of the same coin?
    Savazzi S; Posteraro L; Veronesi G; Mancini F
    Brain; 2007 Aug; 130(Pt 8):2070-84. PubMed ID: 17584772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A mathematical model of line bisection behaviour in neglect.
    Anderson B
    Brain; 1996 Jun; 119 ( Pt 3)():841-50. PubMed ID: 8673496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.