These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35970116)

  • 1. Breast phantom made of acrylic slabs for tests in mammography DR.
    Bustos Flores M; Prata Mourão A; Chevalier Del Rio M
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2022 Oct; 188():110389. PubMed ID: 35970116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data.
    Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Young KC; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ; Schopphoven S; Jeukens CR; Veldkamp WJ; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):7893-907. PubMed ID: 26407015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thick slices from tomosynthesis data sets: phantom study for the evaluation of different algorithms.
    Diekmann F; Meyer H; Diekmann S; Puong S; Muller S; Bick U; Rogalla P
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Oct; 22(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 17955296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.
    Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
    Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
    Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technical note: Design and initial evaluation of a novel physical breast phantom to monitor image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Fitton I; Noël A; Minassian J; Zerhouni M; Wojak J; Adel M; Fournier L
    Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2355-2365. PubMed ID: 35100445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast phantoms for 2D digital mammography with realistic anatomical structures and attenuation characteristics based on clinical images using 3D printing.
    Schopphoven S; Cavael P; Bock K; Fiebich M; Mäder U
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(21):215005. PubMed ID: 31469105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of different exposure parameters on radiation dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: A phantom study.
    Asbeutah AM; Brindhaban A; AlMajran AA; Asbeutah SA
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):e129-e133. PubMed ID: 32052759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose profile evaluation in digital breast tomosynthesis exposition using radiochromic film.
    Flores MB; Mourão AP; Oliveira FA; Del Río MC
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2019 Oct; 152():140-144. PubMed ID: 31299451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
    James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose assessment in contrast enhanced digital mammography using simple phantoms simulating standard model breasts.
    Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Young KC; Veldkamp WJ; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):N1-7. PubMed ID: 25500435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast detail phantom comparison on a commercially available unit. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Borasi G; Botti A; Tassoni D; Sghedoni R; Zuccoli G
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Feb; 24(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 20131074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel physical anthropomorphic breast phantom for 2D and 3D x-ray imaging.
    Ikejimba LC; Graff CG; Rosenthal S; Badal A; Ghammraoui B; Lo JY; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):407-416. PubMed ID: 27992059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fabrication of microcalcifications for insertion into phantoms used to evaluate x-ray breast imaging systems.
    Ghammraoui B; Zidan A; Alayoubi A; Zidan A; Glick SJ
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Aug; 7(5):. PubMed ID: 34375962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast tomosynthesis: Dosimetry and image quality assessment on phantom.
    Meyblum E; Gardavaud F; Dao TH; Fournier V; Beaussart P; Pigneur F; Baranes L; Rahmouni A; Luciani A
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2015 Sep; 96(9):931-9. PubMed ID: 25908324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new test phantom with different breast tissue compositions for image quality assessment in conventional and digital mammography.
    Pachoud M; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(23):5267-81. PubMed ID: 15656276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
    Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative power law analysis of structured breast phantom and patient images in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081920. PubMed ID: 23927334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
    Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.