168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35970139)
1. Ultrasound Evaluation of Mid-Urethral Sling Position: A Potential Predictor of Outcomes and Adverse Effects.
Ghanbari Z; Ayati E; Bastani P; Pourali L; Amini E
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2022; 87(6):344-351. PubMed ID: 35970139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery procedures associated with the position of the sling?
Kociszewski J; Fabian G; Grothey S; Kuszka A; Zwierzchowska A; Majkusiak W; Barcz E
Int J Urol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 27907976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following surgical anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs Miniarc).
Lo TS; Tan YL; Wu PY; Cortes EF; Pue LB; Al-Kharabsheh A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():91-7. PubMed ID: 25265496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospective study on the management and follow-up of 18 patients with a mid-urethral sling penetrating the urethra or bladder.
Goujon E; Jarniat A; Bardet F; Bergogne L; Delorme E
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 47(7):289-297. PubMed ID: 29783036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Saraswat L; Rehman H; Omar MI; Cody JD; Aluko P; Glazener CM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jan; 1(1):CD001754. PubMed ID: 31990055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positioning of a suburethral sling at the bladder neck is associated with a higher recurrence rate of stress urinary incontinence.
Jiang YH; Wang CC; Chuang FC; Ke QS; Kuo HC
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Feb; 32(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 23341378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readjustable Sling in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence and Hypomobile Urethra: Understanding the Mechanisms of Closure by Transperineal Ultrasound.
Ros C; Escura S; Anglès-Acedo S; Bataller E; Amat L; Sánchez E; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Dec; 41(12):3069-3078. PubMed ID: 36044020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence.
Baessler K; Christmann-Schmid C; Maher C; Haya N; Crawford TJ; Brown J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD013108. PubMed ID: 30121956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlations between Sonographic and Urodynamic Findings after Mid Urethral Sling Surgery.
Wen L; Shek KL; Subramaniam N; Friedman T; Dietz HP
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1571-1576. PubMed ID: 29288123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Most of the patients with suburethral sling failure have tapes located outside the high-pressure zone of the urethra.
Bogusiewicz M; Monist M; Stankiewicz A; Woźniak M; Wieczorek AP; Rechberger T
Ginekol Pol; 2013 May; 84(5):334-8. PubMed ID: 23819397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Bladder injury during sling operation in the treatment of SUI--review of literature and case report].
Gałczyński K; Futyma K; Bar K; Rechberger T
Ginekol Pol; 2012 Oct; 83(10):784-8. PubMed ID: 23383566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials.
Daneshgari F; Kong W; Swartz M
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1890-7. PubMed ID: 18801499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term patient satisfaction after retropubic and transobturator mid-urethral slings for female stress urinary incontinence.
Al-Zahrani AA; Gajewski J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1180-5. PubMed ID: 27279335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.
Brazzelli M; Javanbakht M; Imamura M; Hudson J; Moloney E; Becker F; Wallace S; Omar MI; Shimonovich M; MacLennan G; Ternent L; Vale L; Montgomery I; Mackie P; Saraswat L; Monga A; Craig D
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Mar; 23(14):1-306. PubMed ID: 30929658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.
Ford AA; Rogerson L; Cody JD; Ogah J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; (7):CD006375. PubMed ID: 26130017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transobturator tape versus single incision sling: how are they different? Clinical outcomes and ultrasonographic features of two mid-urethral slings.
Caramazza D; Campagna G; Moro F; Vacca L; Marturano M; Pizzacalla S; Trivellizzi IN; Panico G; Scambia G; Ercoli A; Testa AC
World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2521-2528. PubMed ID: 35982168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Challenges of Multidimensional Outcome Reporting after Suburethral Mid Urethral Sling Removal.
Shakir NA; Wang C; Singla N; Alhalabi F; Christie A; Lemack GE; Zimmern PE
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1577-1583. PubMed ID: 29307687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the suburethral sling change its location?
Majkusiak W; Pomian A; Tomasik P; Horosz E; Zwierzchowska A; Kociszewski J; Barcz E
Int J Urol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):848-853. PubMed ID: 28929543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between translabial ultrasound parameters and outcomes in retropubic mid-urethral slings: can we predict success?
Tan YH; Frazer MI; Hughes I; Wong V
World J Urol; 2021 Jan; 39(1):163-168. PubMed ID: 32193651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Midterm postoperative results of mid-urethral slings. Role of ultrasound in explaining surgical failures.
Escura S; Ros C; Anglès-Acedo S; Bataller E; Sánchez E; Carmona F; Espuña-Pons M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2022 Nov; 41(8):1834-1843. PubMed ID: 36057980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
