228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35970602)
1. Open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: A two-center retrospective cohort study with pathologic review of usual-type adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.
Kim Y; Kim SI; Kim H; Lee M; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Lee C; Suh DH
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 167(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 35970602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.
Frumovitz M; Obermair A; Coleman RL; Pareja R; Lopez A; Ribero R; Isla D; Rendon G; Bernardini MQ; Buda A; Moretti-Marquez R; Zevallos A; Vieira MA; Zhu T; Land RP; Nicklin J; Asher R; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Ramirez PT
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Jun; 21(6):851-860. PubMed ID: 32502445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adenosquamous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma in early-stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy: an outcomes analysis.
dos Reis R; Frumovitz M; Milam MR; Capp E; Sun CC; Coleman RL; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Dec; 107(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 17854872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical conization before primary radical hysterectomy has a protective effect on disease recurrence in early cervical cancer: A two-center matched cohort study according to surgical approach.
Kim SI; Choi BR; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Choi CH; Lee M
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 164(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34969535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan.
Ohta T; Nagase S; Okui Y; Enomoto T; Yamagami W; Mikami M; Tokunaga H; Ino K; Ushijima K; Shozu M; Tashiro H; Mandai M; Miyamoto S; Morishige KI; Yoshida Y; Yoshino K; Saito T; Kobayashi E; Kobayashi H; Takekuma M; Terai Y; Fujii T; Kanao H; Aoki D; Katabuchi H; Yaegashi N
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Dec; 26(12):2318-2330. PubMed ID: 34435284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.
Kim SI; Kim TH; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon HW; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Yonsei Med J; 2021 Mar; 62(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 33635013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of different surgical approaches in the clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial in China.
Chao X; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Lang J; Cheng A; Li W
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e029055. PubMed ID: 31362966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical analysis of 132 cases of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma and cervical adenocarcinoma].
Meng YH; Li S; Hu T; Ma D; Lu YP; Wang H
Chin J Cancer; 2010 Jan; 29(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 20038304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.
Uppal S; Gehrig PA; Peng K; Bixel KL; Matsuo K; Vetter MH; Davidson BA; Cisa MP; Lees BF; Brunette LL; Tucker K; Stuart Staley A; Gotlieb WH; Holloway RW; Essel KG; Holman LL; Goldfeld E; Olawaiye A; Rose SL
J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 38(10):1030-1040. PubMed ID: 32031867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical behaviors and outcomes for adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of cervix treated by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.
Huang YT; Wang CC; Tsai CS; Lai CH; Chang TC; Chou HH; Lee SP; Hong JH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 22365621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study.
Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao MM; Cibula D; Wu X; Falconer H; Persson J; Perrotta M; Mosgaard BJ; Kucukmetin A; Berlev I; Rendon G; Liu K; Vieira M; Capilna ME; Fotopoulou C; Baiocchi G; Kaidarova D; Ribeiro R; Pedra-Nobre S; Kocian R; Li X; Li J; Pálsdóttir K; Noll F; Rundle S; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Gheorghe M; Saso S; Bolatbekova R; Tsunoda A; Pitcher B; Wu J; Urbauer D; Pareja R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 226(1):97.e1-97.e16. PubMed ID: 34461074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An analysis of cell type in patients with surgically staged stage IB carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Look KY; Brunetto VL; Clarke-Pearson DL; Averette HE; Major FJ; Alvarez RD; Homesley HD; Zaino RJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Dec; 63(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 8946863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjuvant hysterectomy following primary chemoradiation for stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer: a retrospective comparison of complications for open versus minimally invasive surgery.
Miller H; Matsuo K; Roman LD; Yessaian AA; Pham HQ; Hom M; Castaneda A; Pham A; Ragab O; Muderspach L; Ciccone M; Brunette LL
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 34187504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
