160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35971017)
1. Efficacy and safety of 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser versus long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser in treating enlarged facial pores.
Wang Y; Zheng Y; Cai S
Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Oct; 37(8):3279-3284. PubMed ID: 35971017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Split-face comparison of the picosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser using a microlens array and the quasi-long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of photoaging facial wrinkles and pores in Asians.
Yim S; Lee YH; Choi YJ; Kim WS
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 35(4):949-956. PubMed ID: 31734761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The comparison of the efficacy and safety of fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser and nonablative fractional 1565 nm laser in the treatment of enlarged pores: A prospective split-face study.
Qian C; Jiang Y; Wu Y; Yue B; Yan S; Lu Z
Lasers Surg Med; 2023 Feb; 55(2):169-177. PubMed ID: 36718089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-pulsed and Q-switched ND-YAG laser with topical carbon versus fractional CO
Tarek E; Mostafa WZ; Allam RSHM; El-Samanoudy SI; Saadi DG
Lasers Surg Med; 2022 Feb; 54(2):237-244. PubMed ID: 34255869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of various parameters of the 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of enlarged facial pores.
Roh MR; Chung HJ; Chung KY
J Dermatolog Treat; 2009; 20(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 19125363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Split-face comparison of long-pulse-duration neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064-nm laser alone and combination long-pulse and Q-switched Nd:YAG 1,064-nm laser with carbon photoenhancer lotion for the treatment of enlarged pores in Asian women.
Wattanakrai P; Rojhirunsakool S; Pootongkam S
Dermatol Surg; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1672-80. PubMed ID: 20961349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and safety of long pulse Nd:YAG laser versus fractional erbium:YAG laser in the treatment of facial skin wrinkles.
Dadkhahfar S; Fadakar K; Robati RM
Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Apr; 34(3):457-464. PubMed ID: 30117052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the 1064-nm picosecond laser with fractionated microlens array and 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser for the treatment of enlarged pores: a randomized, split-face, controlled trial.
Liu X; Zeng R; Liu Y; Guo L; Zhang M; Zheng H; Wu Q; Ge Y; Lin T
Lasers Med Sci; 2024 Feb; 39(1):80. PubMed ID: 38396012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Split-Face Assessment of the Synergistic Potential of Sequential Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser and 1565 nm Fractional Nonablative Laser Treatment for Facial Rejuvenation in Fitzpatrick Skin Type II-V Patients.
Munavalli G
J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 15(11):1335-1342. PubMed ID: 28095544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combination of Q-switched and quasi long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser, non-ablative 1450-nm diode laser, and ablative 10 600-nm carbon dioxide fractional laser for enlarged pores.
Cho SB; Noh S; Lee SJ; Kang JM; Kim YK; Lee JH
J Dermatolog Treat; 2010 Jul; 21(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 20509817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of the long-term efficacy and safety of a 1064-nm picosecond laser with fractionated microlens array in the treatment of enlarged pores in Asians: A case-control study.
Palawisuth S; Manuskiatti W; Apinuntham C; Wanitphakdeedecha R; Cembrano KAG
Lasers Surg Med; 2022 Mar; 54(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 34233039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A combination of 1064 nm Q-switched fractional ND-YAG laser with a nonfractional microsecond pulsed technology has a synergistic effect for nonablative facial rejuvenation.
Akerman L; Lapidoth M; Levi A; Sharon E; Hilewitz D; Solomon-Cohen E
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Aug; 20(8):2515-2518. PubMed ID: 33355995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of fractional CO
Robati RM; Asadi E
Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 32(2):283-289. PubMed ID: 27885522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Split lesion randomized comparative study between long pulsed Nd:YAG laser 532 and 1,064 nm in treatment of facial port-wine stain.
Al-Dhalimi MA; Al-Janabi MH
Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Nov; 48(9):852-858. PubMed ID: 27669109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of enlarged pores with the quasi long-pulsed versus Q-switched 1064 nm Nd:YAG lasers: A split-face, comparative, controlled study.
Roh M; Goo B; Jung J; Chung H; Chung K
Laser Ther; 2011; 20(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 24155526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of 30% supramolecular salicylic acid followed by 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser on facial acne and subsequent enlarged pores.
Han Q; Zeng J; Liu Y; Yin J; Sun P; Wu Y
Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Mar; 38(1):91. PubMed ID: 36947275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fractional, nonablative Q-switched 1,064-nm neodymium YAG laser to rejuvenate photoaged skin: a pilot case series.
Luebberding S; Alexiades-Armenakas MR
J Drugs Dermatol; 2012 Nov; 11(11):1300-4. PubMed ID: 23135078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of efficacy between long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser and pulsed dye laser to treat rosacea-associated nasal telangiectasia.
Kwon WJ; Park BW; Cho EB; Park EJ; Kim KH; Kim KJ
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2018 Oct; 20(5):260-264. PubMed ID: 29388843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fractional carbon dioxide laser versus carbon-assisted Q-switched Nd: YAG laser in the treatment of dilated facial pores.
Eldeeb F; Wahid RM; Alakad R
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Dec; 20(12):3917-3923. PubMed ID: 34169628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fractional microneedle radiofrequency device and fractional erbium-doped glass 1,565-nm device treatment of human facial photoaging: a prospective, split-face, random clinical trial.
Dou W; Yang Q; Yin Y; Fan X; Yang Z; Jian Z; Zhu Y; Wei J; Jing H; Ma X
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2021 Aug; 23(5-6):142-148. PubMed ID: 35083965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
