These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35971017)
1. Efficacy and safety of 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser versus long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser in treating enlarged facial pores. Wang Y; Zheng Y; Cai S Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Oct; 37(8):3279-3284. PubMed ID: 35971017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Split-face comparison of the picosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser using a microlens array and the quasi-long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of photoaging facial wrinkles and pores in Asians. Yim S; Lee YH; Choi YJ; Kim WS Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 35(4):949-956. PubMed ID: 31734761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The comparison of the efficacy and safety of fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser and nonablative fractional 1565 nm laser in the treatment of enlarged pores: A prospective split-face study. Qian C; Jiang Y; Wu Y; Yue B; Yan S; Lu Z Lasers Surg Med; 2023 Feb; 55(2):169-177. PubMed ID: 36718089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-pulsed and Q-switched ND-YAG laser with topical carbon versus fractional CO Tarek E; Mostafa WZ; Allam RSHM; El-Samanoudy SI; Saadi DG Lasers Surg Med; 2022 Feb; 54(2):237-244. PubMed ID: 34255869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of various parameters of the 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of enlarged facial pores. Roh MR; Chung HJ; Chung KY J Dermatolog Treat; 2009; 20(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 19125363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Split-face comparison of long-pulse-duration neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064-nm laser alone and combination long-pulse and Q-switched Nd:YAG 1,064-nm laser with carbon photoenhancer lotion for the treatment of enlarged pores in Asian women. Wattanakrai P; Rojhirunsakool S; Pootongkam S Dermatol Surg; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1672-80. PubMed ID: 20961349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and safety of long pulse Nd:YAG laser versus fractional erbium:YAG laser in the treatment of facial skin wrinkles. Dadkhahfar S; Fadakar K; Robati RM Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Apr; 34(3):457-464. PubMed ID: 30117052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the 1064-nm picosecond laser with fractionated microlens array and 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser for the treatment of enlarged pores: a randomized, split-face, controlled trial. Liu X; Zeng R; Liu Y; Guo L; Zhang M; Zheng H; Wu Q; Ge Y; Lin T Lasers Med Sci; 2024 Feb; 39(1):80. PubMed ID: 38396012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Split-Face Assessment of the Synergistic Potential of Sequential Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser and 1565 nm Fractional Nonablative Laser Treatment for Facial Rejuvenation in Fitzpatrick Skin Type II-V Patients. Munavalli G J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 15(11):1335-1342. PubMed ID: 28095544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combination of Q-switched and quasi long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser, non-ablative 1450-nm diode laser, and ablative 10 600-nm carbon dioxide fractional laser for enlarged pores. Cho SB; Noh S; Lee SJ; Kang JM; Kim YK; Lee JH J Dermatolog Treat; 2010 Jul; 21(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 20509817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of the long-term efficacy and safety of a 1064-nm picosecond laser with fractionated microlens array in the treatment of enlarged pores in Asians: A case-control study. Palawisuth S; Manuskiatti W; Apinuntham C; Wanitphakdeedecha R; Cembrano KAG Lasers Surg Med; 2022 Mar; 54(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 34233039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A combination of 1064 nm Q-switched fractional ND-YAG laser with a nonfractional microsecond pulsed technology has a synergistic effect for nonablative facial rejuvenation. Akerman L; Lapidoth M; Levi A; Sharon E; Hilewitz D; Solomon-Cohen E J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Aug; 20(8):2515-2518. PubMed ID: 33355995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of fractional CO Robati RM; Asadi E Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 32(2):283-289. PubMed ID: 27885522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Split lesion randomized comparative study between long pulsed Nd:YAG laser 532 and 1,064 nm in treatment of facial port-wine stain. Al-Dhalimi MA; Al-Janabi MH Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Nov; 48(9):852-858. PubMed ID: 27669109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of enlarged pores with the quasi long-pulsed versus Q-switched 1064 nm Nd:YAG lasers: A split-face, comparative, controlled study. Roh M; Goo B; Jung J; Chung H; Chung K Laser Ther; 2011; 20(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 24155526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of 30% supramolecular salicylic acid followed by 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser on facial acne and subsequent enlarged pores. Han Q; Zeng J; Liu Y; Yin J; Sun P; Wu Y Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Mar; 38(1):91. PubMed ID: 36947275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fractional, nonablative Q-switched 1,064-nm neodymium YAG laser to rejuvenate photoaged skin: a pilot case series. Luebberding S; Alexiades-Armenakas MR J Drugs Dermatol; 2012 Nov; 11(11):1300-4. PubMed ID: 23135078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of efficacy between long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser and pulsed dye laser to treat rosacea-associated nasal telangiectasia. Kwon WJ; Park BW; Cho EB; Park EJ; Kim KH; Kim KJ J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2018 Oct; 20(5):260-264. PubMed ID: 29388843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fractional carbon dioxide laser versus carbon-assisted Q-switched Nd: YAG laser in the treatment of dilated facial pores. Eldeeb F; Wahid RM; Alakad R J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Dec; 20(12):3917-3923. PubMed ID: 34169628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fractional microneedle radiofrequency device and fractional erbium-doped glass 1,565-nm device treatment of human facial photoaging: a prospective, split-face, random clinical trial. Dou W; Yang Q; Yin Y; Fan X; Yang Z; Jian Z; Zhu Y; Wei J; Jing H; Ma X J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2021 Aug; 23(5-6):142-148. PubMed ID: 35083965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]