343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35971843)
1. Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Demonstrate Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling and Impaired Cardiac Function Before Surgery With Increased Risk of Postoperative Heart Failure.
Wedin JO; Vedin O; Rodin S; Simonson OE; Hörsne Malmborg J; Pallin J; James SK; Flachskampf FA; Ståhle E; Grinnemo KH
Circulation; 2022 Oct; 146(17):1310-1322. PubMed ID: 35971843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Impact of bicuspid aortic valve or tricuspid aortic valve on hemodynamics and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement].
Zhang JQ; Chi CW; Zhao WL; Meng QT; Wang LD; Liu JY; Sun FZ; Zhang SL; Liu JH
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 50(12):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 36517440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Less pronounced reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to tricuspid aortic stenosis.
Xiong TY; Wang X; Li YJ; Liao YB; Zhao ZG; Wei X; Xu YN; Zheng MX; Zhou X; Peng Y; Wei JF; Feng Y; Chen M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 34(11):1761-1767. PubMed ID: 29915878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence of subannular and left ventricular morphological differences in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis.
Disha K; Dubslaff G; Rouman M; Fey B; Borger MA; Barker AJ; Kuntze T; Girdauskas E
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Mar; 24(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 28040769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in metabolic profiles between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic stenosis in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Xiong TY; Liu C; Liao YB; Zheng W; Li YJ; Li X; Ou Y; Wang ZJ; Wang X; Li CM; Zhao ZG; Feng Y; Liu XJ; Chen M
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 May; 20(1):229. PubMed ID: 32423380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Persistence of Reduced Left Ventricular Function after Aortic Valve Surgery for Aortic Valve Regurgitation: Bicuspid versus Tricuspid.
Petersen J; Neumann N; Naito S; Sequeira Gross T; Massel R; Reichenspurner H; Girdauskas E
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 69(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 31299697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comprehensive MR Analysis of Cardiac Function, Aortic Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular Strain in Pediatric Cohort with Isolated Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
Stefek HA; Berhane H; Robinson JD; Reilly B; Ruh A; Markl M; Rigsby CK
Pediatr Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 40(7):1450-1459. PubMed ID: 31342116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance analysis of ventricular volumes in bicuspid and trileaflet aortic regurgitation.
Sevilla T; Rojas G; González-Bartol E; Candela J; Gil JF; Revilla A; Aristizabal-Duque C; Gomez Salvador I; San Román Calvar JA
Heart; 2023 Sep; 109(20):1558-1563. PubMed ID: 37230740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multichamber Strain Characterization Is a Robust Prognosticator for Both Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis.
Ye Z; Yang LT; Medina-Inojosa JR; Scott CG; Padang R; Luis SA; Nkomo VT; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2022 Sep; 35(9):956-965. PubMed ID: 35613661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aortic root replacement with bicuspid valve reimplantation: Are outcomes and valve durability comparable to those of tricuspid valve reimplantation?
Mokashi SA; Rosinski BF; Desai MY; Griffin BP; Hammer DF; Kalahasti V; Johnston DR; Rajeswaran J; Roselli EE; Blackstone EH; Svensson LG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Jan; 163(1):51-63.e5. PubMed ID: 32684389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis.
Huntley GD; Thaden JJ; Alsidawi S; Michelena HI; Maleszewski JJ; Edwards WD; Scott CG; Pislaru SV; Pellikka PA; Greason KL; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Enriquez-Sarano M; Nkomo VT
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 29029001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of left ventricular myocardial mechanics in patients with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen H; Liang H; Wang T; Zhao H; Yang J; Chen X
Echocardiography; 2021 Jun; 38(6):834-843. PubMed ID: 33929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Left ventricular myocardial work for the prediction of postoperative outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis.
Lu F; Wu B; Li J; Xu N; Jiang H; Shu X; Wang Y
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Dec; 39(12):2497-2506. PubMed ID: 37831293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-Term Recovery of Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease.
Disha K; Espinoza A; Rouman M; Secknus MA; Kuntze T; Girdauskas E
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 64(5):418-26. PubMed ID: 26251215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Left ventricle remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic valve.
Suwa K; Rahsepar AA; Geiger J; Dolan R; Ghasemiesfe A; Barker AJ; Collins JD; Markl M; Carr JC
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Feb; 39(2):391-399. PubMed ID: 36315365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patterns of ascending aortic dilatation and predictors of surgical replacement of the aorta: A comparison of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve patients over eight years of follow-up.
Agnese V; Pasta S; Michelena HI; Minà C; Romano GM; Carerj S; Zito C; Maalouf JF; Foley TA; Raffa G; Clemenza F; Pilato M; Bellavia D
J Mol Cell Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 135():31-39. PubMed ID: 31348923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
Sia CH; Ho JS; Chua JJ; Tan BY; Ngiam NJ; Chew N; Sim HW; Chen R; Lee CH; Yeo TC; Kong WK; Poh KK
Am J Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 128():210-215. PubMed ID: 32534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis.
Zhou D; Yidilisi A; Fan J; Zhang Y; Dai H; Zhu G; Guo Y; He Y; Zhu Q; Lin X; Li H; Jiang J; Ng S; Li C; Ren K; Wang L; Liu X; Wang J
EuroIntervention; 2022 Jun; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 35044300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic implications of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
Kong WKF; Vollema EM; Prevedello F; Perry R; Ng ACT; Poh KK; Almeida AG; González A; Shen M; Yeo TC; Shanks M; Popescu BA; Galian Gay L; Fijałkowski M; Liang M; Chen RW; Ajmone Marsan N; Selvanayagam J; Pinto F; Zamorano JL; Pibarot P; Evangelista A; Delgado V; Bax JJ
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jul; 21(7):759-767. PubMed ID: 31633159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology.
Ye Z; Clavel MA; Foley TA; Pibarot P; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
Heart; 2024 Mar; 110(8):594-602. PubMed ID: 37903555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
