141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35972023)
1. Concordance between Gleason score of prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens and its predictive factors.
Ariafar A; Rezaeian A; Zare A; Zeighami S; Hosseini SH; Nikbakht HA; Narouie B
Urologia; 2023 May; 90(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 35972023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Mansouri N; Msakni I; Gargouri F; Khiari R; Bouziani A; Laabidi B
Tunis Med; 2018 Jul; 96(7):430-436. PubMed ID: 30430487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinically predictive factors of Gleason score upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy].
Zuo Q; Zhang F; Huang Y; Ma LL; Lu M; Lu J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Aug; 48(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29263497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades.
Epstein JI; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Pierorazio PM
Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):1019-24. PubMed ID: 22336380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Discrepancy between Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Abedi AR; Basiri A; Shakhssalim N; Sadri G; Ahadi M; Hojjati SA; Sheykhzadeh S; Askarpour S; Ghiasy S
Urol J; 2020 Aug; 18(4):395-399. PubMed ID: 32798231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Importance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a predictive factor for concordance between the Gleason scores of prostate biopsies and RADICAL prostatectomy specimens.
Lima NG; Soares Dde F; Rhoden EL
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2013 Jun; 68(6):820-4. PubMed ID: 23778496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extended prostate needle biopsy improves concordance of Gleason grading between prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
San Francisco IF; DeWolf WC; Rosen S; Upton M; Olumi AF
J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 12478121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading?
Smith EB; Frierson HF; Mills SE; Boyd JC; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2282-7. PubMed ID: 12001128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should all prostate needle biopsy Gleason score 4 + 4 = 8 prostate cancers be high risk? Implications for shared decision-making and patient counselling.
Ginsburg K; Cole AI; Silverman ME; Livingstone J; Smith DW; Heilbrun LK; Shi D; Mehra R; Sakr WA; Morgan TM; Cher ML
Urol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):78.e1-78.e6. PubMed ID: 31791703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical role of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy confirmed Gleason score 3 + 4 prostate cancer.
Gondo T; Poon BY; Matsumoto K; Bernstein M; Sjoberg DD; Eastham JA
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 24725760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does extended prostate needle biopsy improve the concordance of Gleason scores between biopsy and prostatectomy in the Taiwanese population?
Yang CW; Lin TP; Huang YH; Chung HJ; Kuo JY; Huang WJ; Wu HH; Chang YH; Lin AT; Chen KK
J Chin Med Assoc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):97-101. PubMed ID: 22440266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing patient selection for prostate monotherapy.
Lee AK; Schultz D; Renshaw AA; Richie JP; D'Amico AV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 11172948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Downgrading from Biopsy Gleason 7 to Prostatectomy Gleason 6 on Biochemical Recurrence and Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
J Urol; 2017 Apr; 197(4):1060-1067. PubMed ID: 27847296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer upgrading or downgrading of biopsy Gleason scores at radical prostatectomy: prediction of "regression to the mean" using routine clinical features with correlating biochemical relapse rates.
Altok M; Troncoso P; Achim MF; Matin SF; Gonzalez GN; Davis JW
Asian J Androl; 2019; 21(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 31115364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of Gleason scores between needle-core biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer.
Hsieh TF; Chang CH; Chen WC; Chou CL; Chen CC; Wu HC
J Chin Med Assoc; 2005 Apr; 68(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 15850066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
