These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35972416)

  • 1. Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis.
    Güçlü ZB; Gürbüz A; Deste Gökay G; Durkan R; Oyar P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2022 Oct; 67(5):419-428. PubMed ID: 35972416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gürbüz A; Güçlü ZB; Deste Gökay G; Durkan R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2022 Aug; 67(4):307-315. PubMed ID: 35587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of the design of a mandibular implant-supported zirconia prosthesis on stress distribution.
    Oyar P; Durkan R; Deste G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):502.e1-502.e11. PubMed ID: 32893017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical behavior of implant retained prostheses in the posterior maxilla using different materials: a finite element study.
    Aboelfadl A; Keilig L; Ebeid K; Ahmed MAM; Nouh I; Refaie A; Bourauel C
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Apr; 24(1):455. PubMed ID: 38622680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different framework materials in implant-supported fixed mandibular prosthesis].
    Yu WQ; Li XQ; Chen SY; Ma XN; Xu X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Feb; 56(2):190-195. PubMed ID: 33557504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Barão VA; Delben JA; Lima J; Cabral T; Assunção WG
    J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1312-20. PubMed ID: 23518207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of all-on-four implant designs in mandible on implants and the surrounding bone: A 3-D finite element analysis.
    Deste G; Durkan R
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 23(4):456-463. PubMed ID: 32246650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Cantilever Length and Implant Inclination on the Stress Distribution of Mandibular Prosthetic Restorations Constructed from Monolithic Zirconia Ceramic.
    Durkan R; Oyar P; Deste G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 31923295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Prostheses With Different Prosthetic Materials: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Stress Analysis.
    Arinc H
    Implant Dent; 2018 Jun; 27(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 29517641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of different implant designs on replacement of four teeth of the posterior free-end edentulism: Three-dimensional finite element analysis and clinic case validation.
    Ye Z; Ye H; Jiang Z; Wu S; Feng Z; Liu H; Wang X; Lan R; Lin X; Ding C; Zhang Q; Ding X; Wu L
    Ann Anat; 2023 Aug; 249():152111. PubMed ID: 37247761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tilted and short implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: a 3D-FEA biomechanical evaluation.
    Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas Júnior AC; Anchieta RB; Poveda R; Gupta N; Coelho PG
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e332-42. PubMed ID: 23910435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of stress distribution around all-on-four implants of different angulations and zygoma implants: a 7-model finite element analysis.
    Tezerişener HA; Özalp Ö; Altay MA; Sindel A
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):176. PubMed ID: 38310260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis.
    Moreira de Melo EJ; Francischone CE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):477-484. PubMed ID: 31810614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In Silico Mechanical Effort Analysis of the All-On-4 Design Performed With Platform-Switching Distal Short Dental Implants.
    Santana LCL; Idogava HT; De Foggi CC; Guastaldi FPS; Noritomi PY; Dos Reis BA; Vaz LG
    J Biomech Eng; 2023 Sep; 145(9):. PubMed ID: 37195691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical Stress Analysis of Different Configurations of the All-on-4 Concept in Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Study.
    Santana LCL; Guastaldi FPS; Idogava HT; Noritomi PY; De Foggi CC; Vaz LG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 33600526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study.
    Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Kemmoku DT; Noritomi PY; Consani RL; Barão VA
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Dec; 69():715-25. PubMed ID: 27612765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Framework Material and Posterior Implant Angulation in Full-Arch All-on-4 Implant-Supported Prosthesis Stress Concentration.
    Tribst JPM; Campanelli de Morais D; Melo de Matos JD; Lopes GDRS; Dal Piva AMO; Souto Borges AL; Bottino MA; Lanzotti A; Martorelli M; Ausiello P
    Dent J (Basel); 2022 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 35049610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.