These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35973326)
21. Utilization of agricultural waste biomass and recycling toward circular bioeconomy. Kumar Sarangi P; Subudhi S; Bhatia L; Saha K; Mudgil D; Prasad Shadangi K; Srivastava RK; Pattnaik B; Arya RK Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(4):8526-8539. PubMed ID: 35554831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomass residues as twenty-first century bioenergy feedstock-a comparison of eight integrated assessment models. Hanssen SV; Daioglou V; Steinmann ZJN; Frank S; Popp A; Brunelle T; Lauri P; Hasegawa T; Huijbregts MAJ; Van Vuuren DP Clim Change; 2020; 163(3):1569-1586. PubMed ID: 33364667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Hill J; Nelson E; Tilman D; Polasky S; Tiffany D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Jul; 103(30):11206-10. PubMed ID: 16837571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Landscape patterns of bioenergy in a changing climate: implications for crop allocation and land-use competition. Graves RA; Pearson SM; Turner MG Ecol Appl; 2016 Mar; 26(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 27209792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest. Gelfand I; Sahajpal R; Zhang X; Izaurralde RC; Gross KL; Robertson GP Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7433):514-7. PubMed ID: 23334409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Household anaerobic digester for bioenergy production in developing countries: opportunities and challenges. Surendra KC; Takara D; Jasinski J; Khanal SK Environ Technol; 2013; 34(13-16):1671-89. PubMed ID: 24350427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biofuels from wastes in Marmara Region, Turkey: potentials and constraints. Ocak S; Acar S Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(46):66026-66042. PubMed ID: 34324148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Production costs and operative margins in electric energy generation from biogas. Full-scale case studies in Italy. Riva C; Schievano A; D'Imporzano G; Adani F Waste Manag; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1429-35. PubMed ID: 24841069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spatial and temporal dynamics of agricultural residue resources in the last 30 years in China. Yang Y; Zhang P; Yang X; Xu X Waste Manag Res; 2016 Dec; 34(12):1231-1240. PubMed ID: 27895284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Potential environmental benefits from increased use of bioenergy in China. Fan S; Freedman B; Gao J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 40(3):504-15. PubMed ID: 17638052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Green cheese: partial life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and energy intensity of integrated dairy production and bioenergy systems. Aguirre-Villegas HA; Passos-Fonseca TH; Reinemann DJ; Armentano LE; Wattiaux MA; Cabrera VE; Norman JM; Larson R J Dairy Sci; 2015 Mar; 98(3):1571-92. PubMed ID: 25597974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Agricultural waste management strategies for environmental sustainability. Koul B; Yakoob M; Shah MP Environ Res; 2022 Apr; 206():112285. PubMed ID: 34710442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Review of the Sustainable Utilization of Rice Residues for Bioenergy Conversion Using Different Valorization Techniques, Their Challenges, and Techno-Economic Assessment. Kaniapan S; Pasupuleti J; Patma Nesan K; Abubackar HN; Umar HA; Oladosu TL; Bello SR; Rene ER Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 35329114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fire regimes and potential bioenergy loss from agricultural lands in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Vadrevu K; Lasko K J Environ Manage; 2015 Jan; 148():10-20. PubMed ID: 24502932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bioenergy from dairy manure: technologies, challenges and opportunities. Zhu QL; Wu B; Pisutpaisal N; Wang YW; Ma KD; Dai LC; Qin H; Tan FR; Maeda T; Xu YS; Hu GQ; He MX Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 790():148199. PubMed ID: 34111785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Heat, electricity, or transportation? The optimal use of residual and waste biomass in Europe from an environmental perspective. Steubing B; Zah R; Ludwig C Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 22091634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Consequential environmental life cycle assessment of a farm-scale biogas plant. Van Stappen F; Mathot M; Decruyenaere V; Loriers A; Delcour A; Planchon V; Goffart JP; Stilmant D J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 175():20-32. PubMed ID: 27017269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Co-digestion of rice straw and cow dung to supply cooking fuel and fertilizers in rural India: Impact on human health, resource flows and climate change. Sfez S; De Meester S; Dewulf J Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():1600-1615. PubMed ID: 28810512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sustainable bioenergy contributes to cost-effective climate change mitigation in China. Xu Y; Smith P; Qin Z iScience; 2024 Jul; 27(7):110232. PubMed ID: 39021785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Suitability of Crop Residues as Feedstock for Biofuel Production in South Africa: A Sustainable Win-Win Scenario. Barahira DS; Okudoh VI; Eloka-Eboka AC J Oleo Sci; 2021 Feb; 70(2):213-226. PubMed ID: 33456011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]