These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35973359)

  • 1. Surface-clearance levels for the normal reuse of objects for 413 radionuclides.
    van Dillen T; Russo F; Mommaert C
    J Radiol Prot; 2022 Dec; 42(4):. PubMed ID: 35973359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SUDOQU, a new dose-assessment methodology for radiological surface contamination.
    van Dillen T; van Dijk A
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Sep; 38(3):1147-1203. PubMed ID: 29893714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accounting for ingrowth of radioactive progeny in dose assessments: generic weighting factors for dose coefficients.
    van Dillen T; van Dijk A; Kloosterman A; Russo F; Mommaert C
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Mar; 40(1):83-118. PubMed ID: 31461410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calculation of isotope-specific exemption levels for surface contamination.
    Ogino H; Hattori T
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1282-5. PubMed ID: 19285417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of radioactive steel recycling on the public and professionals.
    Hrncir T; Panik M; Ondra F; Necas V
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Jun; 254-255():98-106. PubMed ID: 23608061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of operational intervention levels for events with release of radionuclides.
    Lange F; Kopp J; Breckow J; Gering F; Grimm C; Müller J; Prüßmann S; Raskob W; Schnadt H; Weiss W
    J Radiol Prot; 2021 Aug; 41(3):. PubMed ID: 33910181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SUDOQU: a new dose model to derive criteria for surface contamination of non-food (consumer) goods, containers and conveyances.
    van Dillen T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(1-2):160-4. PubMed ID: 25305218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing dose of the representative person for the purpose of radiation protection of the public. ICRP publication 101. Approved by the Commission in September 2005.
    ICRP
    Ann ICRP; 2006; 36(3):vii-viii, 5-62. PubMed ID: 17174713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guide for the practical application of the ICRP Human Respiratory Tract Model. A report of ICRP supporting guidance 3: approved by ICRP committee 2 in October 2000.
    Valentin J
    Ann ICRP; 2002; 32(1-2):13-306. PubMed ID: 12667502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reconsideration of the minimum dose constraint for public exposures in radiological protection.
    Hattori T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 18650204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting dose estimates for long-term performance assessments: case study-Armagosa Valley.
    Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Sun LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 17220714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainties in dose coefficients from ingestion of 131I, 137Cs, and 90Sr.
    Apostoaei AI; Miller LF
    Health Phys; 2004 May; 86(5):460-82. PubMed ID: 15083142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ICRP Publication 136: Dose Coefficients for Non-human Biota Environmentally Exposed to Radiation.
    Ulanovsky A; Copplestone D; Batlle JVI;
    Ann ICRP; 2017 Dec; 46(2):1-136. PubMed ID: 29205047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Organ and detriment-weighted dose rate coefficients for exposure to radionuclide-contaminated soil considering body morphometries that differ from reference conditions: adults and children.
    Kofler C; Domal S; Satoh D; Dewji S; Eckerman K; Bolch WE
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2019 Nov; 58(4):477-492. PubMed ID: 31489486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative evaluation of conservatism in the concept of committed dose from internal exposure for radiation workers.
    Sasaki M; Ogino H; Hattori T
    J Radiol Prot; 2021 Nov; 41(4):. PubMed ID: 34038890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose Comparisons for a Site-specific Representative Person Using the Age-dependent Dose Coefficients in CAP88-PC Version 4.
    Stagich BH; Moore KR; Newton JR; Dixon KL; Jannik GT
    Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):338-342. PubMed ID: 28234692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Ranking of radionuclides and pathways according to their contribution to the dose burden to the population resulting from NPP releases].
    Spiridonov SI; Karpenko EI; Sharpan LA
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2013; 53(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 25427373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of dose-rate on risk from internally-deposited radionuclides and the potential need to separate dose-rate effectiveness factor (DREF) from the dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor (DDREF).
    Brooks AL; Eberlein PE; Couch LA; Boecker BB
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):458-69. PubMed ID: 19820455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Annals of the ICRP. A report of: doses to infants from ingestion of radionuclides in mothers' milk.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(3-4):iii, 15-267, 269-80. PubMed ID: 16168243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Studies on internal exposure doses received by the cuban population due to the intake of radionuclides from the environmental sources.
    Tomás Zerquera J; Prendes Alonso M; Fernández Gómez IM; Rodríguez Castro GV; Martínez Ricardo N; López Bejerano G; Ara do López JO; Acosta Rodríguez N; Carrazana González J; Brígido Flores O; Hernández Pérez A; Díaz Rizo O
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 16513820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.