These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35973430)

  • 1. Interaction of bottom-up and top-down neural mechanisms in spatial multi-talker speech perception.
    Patel P; van der Heijden K; Bickel S; Herrero JL; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    Curr Biol; 2022 Sep; 32(18):3971-3986.e4. PubMed ID: 35973430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Joint population coding and temporal coherence link an attended talker's voice and location features in naturalistic multi-talker scenes.
    van der Heijden K; Patel P; Bickel S; Herrero JL; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38798551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hierarchical Encoding of Attended Auditory Objects in Multi-talker Speech Perception.
    O'Sullivan J; Herrero J; Smith E; Schevon C; McKhann GM; Sheth SA; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    Neuron; 2019 Dec; 104(6):1195-1209.e3. PubMed ID: 31648900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus-dependent activations and attention-related modulations in the auditory cortex: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies.
    Alho K; Rinne T; Herron TJ; Woods DL
    Hear Res; 2014 Jan; 307():29-41. PubMed ID: 23938208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functionally integrated neural processing of linguistic and talker information: An event-related fMRI and ERP study.
    Zhang C; Pugh KR; Mencl WE; Molfese PJ; Frost SJ; Magnuson JS; Peng G; Wang WS
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):536-549. PubMed ID: 26343322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frontal cortex selects representations of the talker's mouth to aid in speech perception.
    Ozker M; Yoshor D; Beauchamp MS
    Elife; 2018 Feb; 7():. PubMed ID: 29485404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Double Dissociation between Anterior and Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus for Processing Audiovisual Speech Demonstrated by Electrocorticography.
    Ozker M; Schepers IM; Magnotti JF; Yoshor D; Beauchamp MS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 29(6):1044-1060. PubMed ID: 28253074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes.
    Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial alignment between faces and voices improves selective attention to audio-visual speech.
    Fleming JT; Maddox RK; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):3085. PubMed ID: 34717460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The visual speech head start improves perception and reduces superior temporal cortex responses to auditory speech.
    Karas PJ; Magnotti JF; Metzger BA; Zhu LL; Smith KB; Yoshor D; Beauchamp MS
    Elife; 2019 Aug; 8():. PubMed ID: 31393261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Auditory perception and language: functional imaging of speech sensitive auditory cortex].
    Samson Y; Belin P; Thivard L; Boddaert N; Crozier S; Zilbovicius M
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2001 Sep; 157(8-9 Pt 1):837-46. PubMed ID: 11677406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions.
    Theodore RM; Monto NR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):985-992. PubMed ID: 30604404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved Speech Hearing in Noise with Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation.
    Patel P; Khalighinejad B; Herrero JL; Bickel S; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    J Neurosci; 2022 Apr; 42(17):3648-3658. PubMed ID: 35347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect.
    Green KP; Kuhl PK; Meltzoff AN; Stevens EB
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Dec; 50(6):524-36. PubMed ID: 1780200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripheral hearing loss reduces the ability of children to direct selective attention during multi-talker listening.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():160-172. PubMed ID: 28505526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.