These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35974044)

  • 41. Pediatric radiation dose and risk from bone density measurements using a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner.
    Damilakis J; Solomou G; Manios GE; Karantanas A
    Osteoporos Int; 2013 Jul; 24(7):2025-31. PubMed ID: 23306822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Precision errors, least significant change, and monitoring time interval in pediatric measurements of bone mineral density, body composition, and mechanostat parameters by GE lunar prodigy.
    Jaworski M; Pludowski P
    J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(4):562-9. PubMed ID: 23452871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reference standards for body fat measures using GE dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in Caucasian adults.
    Imboden MT; Welch WA; Swartz AM; Montoye AH; Finch HW; Harber MP; Kaminsky LA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175110. PubMed ID: 28388669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Body composition measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry half-body scans in obese adults.
    Rothney MP; Brychta RJ; Schaefer EV; Chen KY; Skarulis MC
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2009 Jun; 17(6):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19584885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. BMD measurement and precision: a comparison of GE Lunar Prodigy and iDXA densitometers.
    Krueger D; Vallarta-Ast N; Checovich M; Gemar D; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2012; 15(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 22071029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improved precision with Hologic Apex software.
    Fan B; Lewiecki EM; Sherman M; Lu Y; Miller PD; Genant HK; Shepherd JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1597-602. PubMed ID: 18373054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cross-calibration and comparison of variability in 2 bone densitometers in a research setting: the framingham experience.
    Gagnon DR; McLean RR; Hannan MT; Cupples LA; Hogan M; Kiel DP
    J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 20347371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.
    Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Lewiecki EM; Miller P; Genant HK
    Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16823544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of femoral neck BMD evaluation obtained using Lunar DXA and QCT with asynchronous calibration from CT colonography.
    Pickhardt PJ; Bodeen G; Brett A; Brown JK; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 24880495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of the Lunar Prodigy and Stratos DR Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometers to Assess Regional Bone Mineral Density.
    Maïmoun L; Mahadea KK; Boudousq V; Mura T; Mariano-Goulart D
    J Clin Densitom; 2022; 25(4):569-576. PubMed ID: 35909031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fat tissue measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of 3 different fan-beam instruments.
    Malouf J; DiGregorio S; Del Rio L; Torres F; Marin AM; Farrerons J; Herrera S; Domingo P
    J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(2):212-22. PubMed ID: 22698632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Relationships between body composition, muscular strength, and bone mineral density in estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women.
    Sherk VD; Palmer IJ; Bemben MG; Bemben DA
    J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 19155180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Does standardized BMD still remove differences between Hologic and GE-Lunar state-of-the-art DXA systems?
    Fan B; Lu Y; Genant H; Fuerst T; Shepherd J
    Osteoporos Int; 2010 Jul; 21(7):1227-36. PubMed ID: 19859644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cross calibration of DXA as part of an equipment replacement program.
    Pearson D; Horton B; Green DJ
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 16931346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of 99mTc on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of body composition and bone mineral density.
    Fosbøl MØ; Dupont A; Alslev L; Zerahn B
    J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 22832036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reproducibility of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry total and regional body composition measurements using different scanning positions and definitions of regions.
    Lohman M; Tallroth K; Kettunen JA; Marttinen MT
    Metabolism; 2009 Nov; 58(11):1663-8. PubMed ID: 19632696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Height Restrictions for Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry: What Are Our Options for Body Composition and Bone Health Precision?
    Redinger AL; Russell JL; Allen SMF; Baker BS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Jul; 38(7):e359-e365. PubMed ID: 38662930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Discordance of longitudinal changes in bone density between densitometers.
    Frost SA; Nguyen ND; Center JR; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
    Bone; 2007 Oct; 41(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 17870039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessing Agreement of Lateral Leg Muscle and Bone Composition Using Dual X-ray Absorptiometry.
    Raymond-Pope CJ; Bosch TA; Dengel DR
    J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(3):451-458. PubMed ID: 31133502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cross-Calibration of iDXA and pQCT Scanners at Rural and Urban Research Sites in The Gambia, West Africa.
    Ó Breasail M; Janha R; Zengin A; Pearse C; Jarjou L; Prentice A; Ward KA
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2023 May; 112(5):573-583. PubMed ID: 36859609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.