209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35974382)
1. PerSVade: personalized structural variant detection in any species of interest.
Schikora-Tamarit MÀ; Gabaldón T
Genome Biol; 2022 Aug; 23(1):175. PubMed ID: 35974382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structural variant analysis of a cancer reference cell line sample using multiple sequencing technologies.
Talsania K; Shen TW; Chen X; Jaeger E; Li Z; Chen Z; Chen W; Tran B; Kusko R; Wang L; Pang AWC; Yang Z; Choudhari S; Colgan M; Fang LT; Carroll A; Shetty J; Kriga Y; German O; Smirnova T; Liu T; Li J; Kellman B; Hong K; Hastie AR; Natarajan A; Moshrefi A; Granat A; Truong T; Bombardi R; Mankinen V; Meerzaman D; Mason CE; Collins J; Stahlberg E; Xiao C; Wang C; Xiao W; Zhao Y
Genome Biol; 2022 Dec; 23(1):255. PubMed ID: 36514120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls.
Parikh H; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HY; Iyer H; Chen D; Pratt M; Bartha G; Spies N; Losert W; Zook JM; Salit M
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():64. PubMed ID: 26772178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection algorithms for whole genome sequencing.
Kosugi S; Momozawa Y; Liu X; Terao C; Kubo M; Kamatani Y
Genome Biol; 2019 Jun; 20(1):117. PubMed ID: 31159850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. iSVP: an integrated structural variant calling pipeline from high-throughput sequencing data.
Mimori T; Nariai N; Kojima K; Takahashi M; Ono A; Sato Y; Yamaguchi-Kabata Y; Nagasaki M
BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S8. PubMed ID: 24564972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SV-AUTOPILOT: optimized, automated construction of structural variation discovery and benchmarking pipelines.
Leung WY; Marschall T; Paudel Y; Falquet L; Mei H; Schönhuth A; Maoz Moss TY
BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):238. PubMed ID: 25887570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining accurate tumor genome simulation with crowdsourcing to benchmark somatic structural variant detection.
Lee AY; Ewing AD; Ellrott K; Hu Y; Houlahan KE; Bare JC; Espiritu SMG; Huang V; Dang K; Chong Z; Caloian C; Yamaguchi TN; ; Kellen MR; Chen K; Norman TC; Friend SH; Guinney J; Stolovitzky G; Haussler D; Margolin AA; Stuart JM; Boutros PC
Genome Biol; 2018 Nov; 19(1):188. PubMed ID: 30400818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Leveraging long read sequencing from a single individual to provide a comprehensive resource for benchmarking variant calling methods.
Mu JC; Tootoonchi Afshar P; Mohiyuddin M; Chen X; Li J; Bani Asadi N; Gerstein MB; Wong WH; Lam HY
Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():14493. PubMed ID: 26412485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Truvari: refined structural variant comparison preserves allelic diversity.
English AC; Menon VK; Gibbs RA; Metcalf GA; Sedlazeck FJ
Genome Biol; 2022 Dec; 23(1):271. PubMed ID: 36575487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FusorSV: an algorithm for optimally combining data from multiple structural variation detection methods.
Becker T; Lee WP; Leone J; Zhu Q; Zhang C; Liu S; Sargent J; Shanker K; Mil-Homens A; Cerveira E; Ryan M; Cha J; Navarro FCP; Galeev T; Gerstein M; Mills RE; Shin DG; Lee C; Malhotra A
Genome Biol; 2018 Mar; 19(1):38. PubMed ID: 29559002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. StrVCTVRE: A supervised learning method to predict the pathogenicity of human genome structural variants.
Sharo AG; Hu Z; Sunyaev SR; Brenner SE
Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Feb; 109(2):195-209. PubMed ID: 35032432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A survey of algorithms for the detection of genomic structural variants from long-read sequencing data.
Ahsan MU; Liu Q; Perdomo JE; Fang L; Wang K
Nat Methods; 2023 Aug; 20(8):1143-1158. PubMed ID: 37386186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward Recovering Allele-specific Cancer Genome Graphs.
Rajaraman A; Ma J
J Comput Biol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):624-636. PubMed ID: 29658776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. nanotatoR: a tool for enhanced annotation of genomic structural variants.
Bhattacharya S; Barseghyan H; Délot EC; Vilain E
BMC Genomics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):10. PubMed ID: 33407088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Small polymorphisms are a source of ancestral bias in structural variant breakpoint placement.
Audano PA; Beck CR
Genome Res; 2024 Feb; 34(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 38176712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structural variant identification and characterization.
Balachandran P; Beck CR
Chromosome Res; 2020 Mar; 28(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 31907725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structural Variant Detection from Long-Read Sequencing Data with cuteSV.
Jiang T; Liu S; Cao S; Wang Y
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2493():137-151. PubMed ID: 35751813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A recurrence-based approach for validating structural variation using long-read sequencing technology.
Zhao X; Weber AM; Mills RE
Gigascience; 2017 Aug; 6(8):1-9. PubMed ID: 28873962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of structural variants detected by PacBio-CLR and ONT sequencing in pear.
Liu Y; Zhang M; Wang R; Li B; Jiang Y; Sun M; Chang Y; Wu J
BMC Genomics; 2022 Dec; 23(1):830. PubMed ID: 36517766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Expectations and blind spots for structural variation detection from long-read assemblies and short-read genome sequencing technologies.
Zhao X; Collins RL; Lee WP; Weber AM; Jun Y; Zhu Q; Weisburd B; Huang Y; Audano PA; Wang H; Walker M; Lowther C; Fu J; ; Gerstein MB; Devine SE; Marschall T; Korbel JO; Eichler EE; Chaisson MJP; Lee C; Mills RE; Brand H; Talkowski ME
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 May; 108(5):919-928. PubMed ID: 33789087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
