These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3597501)
1. The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. Yoshioka Y; Siu D; Cooke TD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1987 Jul; 69(6):873-80. PubMed ID: 3597501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Femoral anteversion: assessment based on function axes. Yoshioka Y; Cooke TD J Orthop Res; 1987; 5(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 3819914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Dimensions of the lateral condyle in non-arthritic valgus knees. A cadaver study]. Brilhault J; Preyssas P; Favard L; Burdin P Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2002 Nov; 88(7):686-90. PubMed ID: 12457114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing. Anastopoulos G; Chissas D; Dourountakis J; Ntagiopoulos PG; Magnisalis E; Asimakopoulos A; Xenakis TA Injury; 2010 Mar; 41(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 20176170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Modified Ogata-Goldsand Technique for Simplified Intraoperative Measurement of Femoral Version. Morris WZ; Henry H; Liu RW; Streit JJ; Grant RE; Cooperman DR J Pediatr Orthop; 2015 Sep; 35(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 25379819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Berger RA; Rubash HE; Seel MJ; Thompson WH; Crossett LS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jan; (286):40-7. PubMed ID: 8425366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of the femoral neck-shaft angle from the length of the femoral neck. Isaac B; Vettivel S; Prasad R; Jeyaseelan L; Chandi G Clin Anat; 1997; 10(5):318-23. PubMed ID: 9283729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of varus and valgus osteotomies on femoral version. Liu RW; Toogood P; Hart DE; Davy DT; Cooperman DR J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):666-75. PubMed ID: 20104143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femoral anteversion: estimation by 3D modelling. Kim JS; Choi KW; Kim SI Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():1025-9. PubMed ID: 10384615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A cadaveric study of relationships among rotational alignment reference axes of distal femur and tibial mechanical axis]. Zhao BH; Chen BC; Shao DC; Wang F; Gao SJ; Lu B Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 46(14):1085-7. PubMed ID: 19094537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning. Maruyama M; Feinberg JR; Capello WN; D'Antonio JA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Dec; (393):52-65. PubMed ID: 11764371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional orientation of the femoral curvature. How well does it match with the sagittal curvature of femoral implants? Schmitt A; Letissier H; Poltaretskyi S; Babusiaux D; Rosset P; Le Nail LR Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 30591419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of femoral tunnel separation. Markolf KL; Jackson SR; McAllister DR Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jun; 38(6):1141-6. PubMed ID: 20348284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An anatomical study of the pediatric intercondylar notch. Liu RW; Farrow LD; Messerschmitt PJ; Gilmore A; Goodfellow DB; Cooperman DR J Pediatr Orthop; 2008 Mar; 28(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 18388712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of a variable prosthetic neck-shaft angle and the surgical technique on replication of normal humeral anatomy. Jeong J; Bryan J; Iannotti JP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Aug; 91(8):1932-41. PubMed ID: 19651952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The figure-of-four axis as a reference to determine stem rotation in hip arthroplasty. What does it really measure? A cadaver study. Mayr E; Thaler M; Williams A; Moctezuma de La Barrera J; Krismer M; Nogler M Acta Orthop; 2007 Aug; 78(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 17965998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Osteometry of the femora in Turkish individuals: a morphometric study in 114 cadaveric femora as an anatomic basis of femoral component design]. Atilla B; Oznur A; Cağlar O; Tokgözoğlu M; Alpaslan M Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2007; 41(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17483639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The proximal femur--a second look at rational of implant design. Mishra AK; Chalise P; Singh RP; Shah RK Nepal Med Coll J; 2009 Dec; 11(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 20635610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]