These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35975624)

  • 21. Errors may not cue recall of corrective feedback: Evidence against the mediation hypothesis of the testing effect.
    Leggett JMI; Burt JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 31944809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 22238214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Encoding specificity revisited: the role of semantics.
    Hannon B; Craik FI
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 55(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 11605558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Older adults show deficits in retrieving and decoding associative mediators generated at study.
    Hertzog C; Fulton EK; Mandviwala L; Dunlosky J
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Jun; 49(6):1127-31. PubMed ID: 22799582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.
    Nelson DL; Fisher SL; Akirmak U
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1892-904. PubMed ID: 18265606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Practicing more retrieval routes leads to greater memory retention.
    Zheng J; Zhang W; Li T; Liu Z; Luo L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():109-18. PubMed ID: 27270228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Why testing improves memory: mediator effectiveness hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Science; 2010 Oct; 330(6002):335. PubMed ID: 20947756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Behavioral representational similarity analysis reveals how episodic learning is influenced by and reshapes semantic memory.
    Walsh CR; Rissman J
    Nat Commun; 2023 Nov; 14(1):7548. PubMed ID: 37985774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Conditions of highly specific learning through cued recall.
    Pan SC; Lovelett J; Stoeckenius D; Rickard TC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):634-640. PubMed ID: 30937830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter?
    Goh WD; Tan H
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1063-79. PubMed ID: 17128605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Age of acquisition's effect on memory for semantically associated word pairs.
    Gullick MM; Juhasz BJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 18609409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interpolated retrieval retroactively increases recall and promotes cross-episode memory interdependence.
    Wahlheim CN; Smith ST; Garlitch SM; Wiley RW
    Learn Mem; 2023 Aug; 30(8):151-163. PubMed ID: 37582610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semantic organization and verbal episodic memory in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease.
    Herlitz A; Viitanen M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1991 Jul; 13(4):559-74. PubMed ID: 1918286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The roles of encoding strategies and retrieval practice in test-expectancy effects.
    Cho KW; Neely JH
    Memory; 2017 May; 25(5):626-635. PubMed ID: 27348692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Test-enhanced learning for pairs and triplets: When and why does transfer occur?
    Rickard TC; Pan SC
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1146-1160. PubMed ID: 32495320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.