161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35975864)
1. Sonographic Features of Primary Breast Lymphoma: An Analysis of 10 Cases.
Liu X; Liu J; Chen S
Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(6):579-586. PubMed ID: 35975864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Ultrasonographic features of primary non-Hodgkin's breast lymphoma].
Li N; Jiang YX; Dai Q
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Jun; 32(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 20602881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.
Ha SM; Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1087):20170787. PubMed ID: 29658793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China.
Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of contrast-enhanced malignancy imaging features in secondary grade diagnosis of BI-RADS-US type 4 breast lesions.
Gao J; Han W; Ai Si Mu Tu La DLMT; Hou X; Li ZM; Song T
Tumori; 2021 Oct; 107(5):424-431. PubMed ID: 33124515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered probably benign or low suspicion: implications for management.
Giess CS; Smeglin LZ; Meyer JE; Ritner JA; Birdwell RL
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1943-9. PubMed ID: 23197547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions.
Dobrosavljević A; Rakić S; Nikoli B; Raznatović SJ; Dikić SD; Milosević Z; Jurisić A; Skrobić M
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Case Series of Malign Hyperechoic Breast Lesions.
Yilmaz TF; Sari L; Temur HO; Toprak H; Yildiz Ş
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):766-773. PubMed ID: 32723248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Probably Benign Breast Nodular Lesions (BI-RADS 3): Correlation between Ultrasound Features and Histologic Findings.
Pistolese CA; Tosti D; Citraro D; Ricci F; Di Stefano C; Lamacchia F; Ferrari D; Floris R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 30340921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gail Model Improves the Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of Ultrasound BI-RADS for Predicting Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Gao LY; Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Luo BM; Zhou Q; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Guo JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S1-S7. PubMed ID: 33384211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of micro-flow imaging and high-definition micro-flow imaging in differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions.
Luo R; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Wang Y; Luo Y
Clin Radiol; 2024 Jan; 79(1):e48-e56. PubMed ID: 37932209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian probability of malignancy with BI-RADS sonographic features.
Bouzghar G; Levenback BJ; Sultan LR; Venkatesh SS; Cwanger A; Conant EF; Sehgal CM
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Apr; 33(4):641-8. PubMed ID: 24658943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small breast lesions.
Du YR; Wu Y; Chen M; Gu XG
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 29710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [An analysis of breast cancer patients with ultrasound BI-RADS 3 lesions after minimally invasive excision in clinicopathological features and influencing factors of residual tumor].
Li L; Feng ZQ; Zhang LF; Wang RQ; Zhang XX; Liu LY; Yu LX; Yu ZG; Gao ZC
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 62(2):135-140. PubMed ID: 38310381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonographic Characteristics and Pathology Correlation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 Lesions.
Khan P; Masroor I; Alam MS; Salam A; Ali Y; Khan MS
Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e51410. PubMed ID: 38292968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound strain elastography for differentiation of malignant breast lesions.
Georgieva M; Prantl L; Utpatel K; Wiesinger I; Stroszczynski C; Jung F; Jung EM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 71(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30584133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Sonographic features of breast imaging reporting and data system assessment category 4 and 5 non-palpable breast lesions].
Zhu QL; Jiang YX; Zhang J; Dai Q; Sun Q
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Aug; 32(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 20868610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of solid breast masses: use of the sonographic breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon.
Costantini M; Belli P; Lombardi R; Franceschini G; Mulè A; Bonomo L
J Ultrasound Med; 2006 May; 25(5):649-59; quiz 661. PubMed ID: 16632790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
