These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35976140)

  • 21. Best Practices for the Design of COVID-19 Dashboards.
    Malkani D; Malkani M; Singh N; Madan E
    Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2023; 20(1):1b. PubMed ID: 37215335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Usability of a patient education and motivation tool using heuristic evaluation.
    Joshi A; Arora M; Dai L; Price K; Vizer L; Sears A
    J Med Internet Res; 2009 Nov; 11(4):e47. PubMed ID: 19897458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. State-of-the-art Dashboards on Clinical Indicator Data to Support Reflection on Practice: Scoping Review.
    Bucalon B; Shaw T; Brown K; Kay J
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Feb; 10(2):e32695. PubMed ID: 35156928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing the Usability of a Clinical Decision Support System: Heuristic Evaluation.
    Cho H; Keenan G; Madandola OO; Dos Santos FC; Macieira TGR; Bjarnadottir RI; Priola KJB; Dunn Lopez K
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 May; 9(2):e31758. PubMed ID: 35536613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Food and Nutrition Systems Dashboards: A Systematic Review.
    Zhou B; Liang S; Monahan KM; Singh GM; Simpson RB; Reedy J; Zhang J; DeVane A; Cruz MS; Marshak A; Mozaffarian D; Wang D; Semenova I; Montoliu I; Prozorovscaia D; Naumova EN
    Adv Nutr; 2022 Jun; 13(3):748-757. PubMed ID: 35254406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Developing public health surveillance dashboards: a scoping review on the design principles.
    Rabiei R; Bastani P; Ahmadi H; Dehghan S; Almasi S
    BMC Public Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):392. PubMed ID: 38321469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Opportunities to Improve COVID-19 Dashboard Designs for the Public.
    Monkman H; Martin SZ; Minshall S; Kushniruk AW; Lesselroth BJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 Nov; 286():16-20. PubMed ID: 34755683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems.
    Bagheri F; Abbasi F; Sadeghi M; Khajouei R
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Jan; 23(1):23. PubMed ID: 36717854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Usability in telemedicine systems-A literature survey.
    Klaassen B; van Beijnum BJ; Hermens HJ
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Sep; 93():57-69. PubMed ID: 27435948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of two heuristic evaluation methods for evaluating the usability of health information systems.
    Khajouei R; Hajesmaeel Gohari S; Mirzaee M
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Apr; 80():37-42. PubMed ID: 29499315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development and usability testing of an audit and feedback tool for anesthesiologists.
    Barbeito A; Segall N
    JAMIA Open; 2019 Apr; 2(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 31984342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Underrepresented Populations on Public Health Data Dashboards: Design Considerations for Improving Usability and Usefulness.
    Ansari B; Barati M; Yuan X
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39110897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Compliance with design principles: a case study of a widely used laboratory information system.
    Agharezaei Z; Khajouei R; Ahmadian L; Agharezaei L
    East Mediterr Health J; 2020 Dec; 26(12):1456-1464. PubMed ID: 33355384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Employing a user-centered cognitive walkthrough to evaluate a mHealth diabetes self-management application: A case study and beginning method validation.
    Georgsson M; Staggers N; Årsand E; Kushniruk A
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Mar; 91():103110. PubMed ID: 30721757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Design and feasibility of integrating personalized PRO dashboards into prostate cancer care.
    Hartzler AL; Izard JP; Dalkin BL; Mikles SP; Gore JL
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Jan; 23(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 26260247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. User Interface Problems of a Nationwide Inpatient Information System: A Heuristic Evaluation.
    Atashi A; Khajouei R; Azizi A; Dadashi A
    Appl Clin Inform; 2016; 7(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 27081409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Impact of Visualization Dashboards on Quality of Care and Clinician Satisfaction: Integrative Literature Review.
    Khairat SS; Dukkipati A; Lauria HA; Bice T; Travers D; Carson SS
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2018 May; 5(2):e22. PubMed ID: 29853440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Enriching the Value of Patient Experience Feedback: Web-Based Dashboard Development Using Co-design and Heuristic Evaluation.
    Khanbhai M; Symons J; Flott K; Harrison-White S; Spofforth J; Klaber R; Manton D; Darzi A; Mayer E
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Feb; 9(1):e27887. PubMed ID: 35113022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
    Colombini D; Occhipinti E
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.