211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35976392)
1. Fully automatic prognostic biomarker extraction from metastatic prostate lesion segmentations in whole-body [
Kendrick J; Francis RJ; Hassan GM; Rowshanfarzad P; Ong JSL; Ebert MA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Dec; 50(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 35976392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A convolutional neural network-based system for fully automatic segmentation of whole-body [
Jafari E; Zarei A; Dadgar H; Keshavarz A; Manafi-Farid R; Rostami H; Assadi M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Apr; 51(5):1476-1487. PubMed ID: 38095671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic utility of RECIP 1.0 with manual and AI-based segmentations in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer from [
Kendrick J; Francis RJ; Hassan GM; Rowshanfarzad P; Ong JS; McCarthy M; Alexander S; Ebert MA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Nov; 50(13):4077-4086. PubMed ID: 37550494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deep learning-based whole-body characterization of prostate cancer lesions on [
Huang B; Yang Q; Li X; Wu Y; Liu Z; Pan Z; Zhong S; Song S; Zuo C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Mar; 51(4):1173-1184. PubMed ID: 38049657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated segmentation of lesions and organs at risk on [
Yazdani E; Karamzadeh-Ziarati N; Cheshmi SS; Sadeghi M; Geramifar P; Vosoughi H; Jahromi MK; Kheradpisheh SR
Cancer Imaging; 2024 Feb; 24(1):30. PubMed ID: 38424612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic segmentation of prostate cancer metastases in PSMA PET/CT images using deep neural networks with weighted batch-wise dice loss.
Xu Y; Klyuzhin I; Harsini S; Ortiz A; Zhang S; Bénard F; Dodhia R; Uribe CF; Rahmim A; Lavista Ferres J
Comput Biol Med; 2023 May; 158():106882. PubMed ID: 37037147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Examining the Relationship and Prognostic Significance of Cell-Free DNA Levels and the PSMA-Positive Tumor Volume in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective-Prospective [
Kluge K; Einspieler H; Haberl D; Spielvogel C; Stoiber S; Vraka C; Papp L; Wunsch S; Egger G; Kramer G; Grubmüller B; Shariat S; Hacker M; Kenner L; Haug A
J Nucl Med; 2024 Jan; 65(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 38050125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraprostatic Tumor Segmentation on PSMA PET Images in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer with a Convolutional Neural Network.
Kostyszyn D; Fechter T; Bartl N; Grosu AL; Gratzke C; Sigle A; Mix M; Ruf J; Fassbender TF; Kiefer S; Bettermann AS; Nicolay NH; Spohn S; Kramer MU; Bronsert P; Guo H; Qiu X; Wang F; Henkenberens C; Werner RA; Baltas D; Meyer PT; Derlin T; Chen M; Zamboglou C
J Nucl Med; 2021 Jun; 62(6):823-828. PubMed ID: 33127624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep Semisupervised Transfer Learning for Fully Automated Whole-Body Tumor Quantification and Prognosis of Cancer on PET/CT.
Leung KH; Rowe SP; Sadaghiani MS; Leal JP; Mena E; Choyke PL; Du Y; Pomper MG
J Nucl Med; 2024 Apr; 65(4):643-650. PubMed ID: 38423786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of parametric imaging and SUV imaging with [
Chen R; Ng YL; Yang X; Zhu Y; Li L; Zhao H; Zhou Y; Huang G; Liu J
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Jan; 51(2):568-580. PubMed ID: 37792025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole-body uptake classification and prostate cancer staging in
Capobianco N; Sibille L; Chantadisai M; Gafita A; Langbein T; Platsch G; Solari EL; Shah V; Spottiswoode B; Eiber M; Weber WA; Navab N; Nekolla SG
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Jan; 49(2):517-526. PubMed ID: 34232350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of recurrent prostate cancer lesions before salvage lymphadenectomy is more accurate with (68)Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC than with (18)F-Fluoroethylcholine PET/CT.
Pfister D; Porres D; Heidenreich A; Heidegger I; Knuechel R; Steib F; Behrendt FF; Verburg FA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Jul; 43(8):1410-7. PubMed ID: 26993315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybrid imaging with [
Glemser PA; Rotkopf LT; Ziener CH; Beuthien-Baumann B; Weru V; Kopp-Schneider A; Schlemmer HP; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Sachpekidis C
Cancer Imaging; 2022 Sep; 22(1):53. PubMed ID: 36138437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine learning-based prediction of invisible intraprostatic prostate cancer lesions on
Yi Z; Hu S; Lin X; Zou Q; Zou M; Zhang Z; Xu L; Jiang N; Zhang Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Apr; 49(5):1523-1534. PubMed ID: 34845536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
Ceci F; Castellucci P; Graziani T; Farolfi A; Fonti C; Lodi F; Fanti S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jan; 46(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 30350010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semi-automatic evaluation of baseline whole-body tumor burden as an imaging biomarker of
Zou Q; Jiao J; Zou MH; Li MZ; Yang T; Xu L; Zhang Y
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4202-4213. PubMed ID: 32948911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative [
Kendrick J; Francis RJ; Hassan GM; Rowshanfarzad P; Ong JSL; Barry N; Rusanov B; Ebert MA
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17673. PubMed ID: 37848692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
