BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35976434)

  • 1. A retrospective study of preoperative malnutrition based on the Controlling Nutritional Status score as an associated marker for short-term outcomes after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Horinouchi T; Yoshida N; Harada K; Eto K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Iwagami S; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3367-3375. PubMed ID: 35976434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preoperative Nutritional Assessment by Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) is Useful to estimate Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
    Yoshida N; Baba Y; Shigaki H; Harada K; Iwatsuki M; Kurashige J; Sakamoto Y; Miyamoto Y; Ishimoto T; Kosumi K; Tokunaga R; Imamura Y; Ida S; Hiyoshi Y; Watanabe M; Baba H
    World J Surg; 2016 Aug; 40(8):1910-7. PubMed ID: 27220507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may contribute to low incidence of postoperative surgical site infection in patients with poor glycemic control.
    Yamane T; Yoshida N; Horinouchi T; Morinaga T; Eto K; Harada K; Ogawa K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Mar; 407(2):579-585. PubMed ID: 34459983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
    Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) is useful to estimate the prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Yoshida N; Harada K; Baba Y; Kosumi K; Iwatsuki M; Kinoshita K; Nakamura K; Sakamoto Y; Miyamoto Y; Karashima R; Mima K; Sawayama H; Ohuchi M; Chikamoto A; Imamura Y; Watanabe M; Baba H
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):333-341. PubMed ID: 28138759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between the severity of emphysematous change in the lung and morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A retrospective study on a novel strategy for risk prediction.
    Horinouchi T; Yoshida N; Shiraishi S; Hara Y; Matsumoto C; Toihata T; Kosumi K; Harada K; Eto K; Ogawa K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Thorac Cancer; 2024 Jan; 15(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 38069606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical Significance of Pretreatment Red Blood Cell Distribution Width as a Predictive Marker for Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
    Yoshida N; Horinouchi T; Toihata T; Harada K; Eto K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Nagai Y; Ishimoto T; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 29(1):606-613. PubMed ID: 34467503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the short-term clinical outcome between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy by comprehensive complication index.
    Ma G; Cao H; Wei R; Qu X; Wang L; Zhu L; Du J; Wang Y
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(4):789-794. PubMed ID: 29970654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
    Hayami M; Ndegwa N; Lindblad M; Linder G; Hedberg J; Edholm D; Johansson J; Lagergren J; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5609-5621. PubMed ID: 35752726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preoperative Smoking Cessation is Integral to the Prevention of Postoperative Morbidities in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Yoshida N; Nakamura K; Kuroda D; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Iwatsuki M; Hiyoshi Y; Ishimoto T; Imamura Y; Watanabe M; Baba H
    World J Surg; 2018 Sep; 42(9):2902-2909. PubMed ID: 29532141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Replace Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer? Latest Analysis of 24,233 Esophagectomies From the Japanese National Clinical Database.
    Yoshida N; Yamamoto H; Baba H; Miyata H; Watanabe M; Toh Y; Matsubara H; Kakeji Y; Seto Y
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jul; 272(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 30720501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Up-Front Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy on Quality of Life for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.
    Li Z; Cheng J; Zhang Y; Wen S; Lv H; Xu Y; Zhu Y; Zhang Z; Mu D; Tian Z
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):693-701. PubMed ID: 33503901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
    Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared to Open Esophagectomy.
    Gottlieb-Vedi E; Kauppila JH; Mattsson F; Lindblad M; Nilsson M; Lagergren P; Rouvelas I; Lagergren J;
    Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):e744-e748. PubMed ID: 33480612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.