BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35976562)

  • 1. Comparison between filgrastim biosimilar and filgrastim original for the management of neutropenia after salvage chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma.
    Shimano R; Yamamoto H; Nasu I; Kashiwamura Y; Yamamoto G; Uchida N; Taniguchi S; Hayashi M; Ito T
    Int J Hematol; 2022 Dec; 116(6):856-862. PubMed ID: 35976562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Outcomes of Treatment with Filgrastim Versus a Filgrastim Biosimilar and Febrile Neutropenia-Associated Costs Among Patients with Nonmyeloid Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy.
    Schwartzberg LS; Lal LS; Balu S; Campbell K; Brekke L; DeLeon A; Elliott C; Korrer S
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Oct; 24(10):976-984. PubMed ID: 29687743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized, double-blind trial of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for the management of neutropenia during CHASE(R) chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma.
    Kubo K; Miyazaki Y; Murayama T; Shimazaki R; Usui N; Urabe A; Hotta T; Tamura K
    Br J Haematol; 2016 Aug; 174(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 27072050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical safety and efficacy of "filgrastim biosimilar 2" in Japanese patients in a post-marketing surveillance study.
    Tamura K; Hashimoto K; Nishikawa K
    J Infect Chemother; 2018 May; 24(5):363-369. PubMed ID: 29398477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy and safety of two pegfilgrastim biosimilars: Tripegfilgrastim and pegteograstim.
    Kang KW; Lee BH; Jeon MJ; Yu ES; Kim DS; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Choi CW; Park Y; Kim BS
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6102-6110. PubMed ID: 32633471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized, multi-center, open-label, phase II study of once-per-cycle DA-3031, a biosimilar pegylated G-CSF, compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving TAC chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.
    Park KH; Sohn JH; Lee S; Park JH; Kang SY; Kim HY; Park IH; Park YH; Im YH; Lee HJ; Hong DS; Park S; Shin SH; Kwon HC; Seo JH
    Invest New Drugs; 2013 Oct; 31(5):1300-6. PubMed ID: 23677653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. G-CSF filgrastim biosimilar-Sandoz reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving chemotherapy regimens with rest periods not exceeding 14 days: A French, multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study.
    Phelip JM; Souquet PJ; Hacini M; Chehimi M; Bourgeois V; Bennoune R; Tredan O
    Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2023; 35():100690. PubMed ID: 36780734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Blackwell K; Semiglazov V; Krasnozhon D; Davidenko I; Nelyubina L; Nakov R; Stiegler G; Singh P; Schwebig A; Kramer S; Harbeck N
    Ann Oncol; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1948-1953. PubMed ID: 26122726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety and efficacy of alternating treatment with EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, and reference filgrastim: a phase III, randomised, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Blackwell K; Gascon P; Krendyukov A; Gattu S; Li Y; Harbeck N
    Ann Oncol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):244-249. PubMed ID: 29091995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor biosimilars in engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: a 4-year, single institute experience with different conditioning regimens.
    Bassi S; Stroppa EM; Moroni CF; Arbasi MC; Trabacchi E; Di Franco A; Lazzaro A; Bernuzzi P; Moretto M; Arcari A; Bosi C; Riva A; Cavanna L; Vallisa D
    Blood Transfus; 2015 Jul; 13(3):478-83. PubMed ID: 25761321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative cost-efficiency across the European G5 countries of various regimens of filgrastim, biosimilar filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia.
    Aapro M; Cornes P; Abraham I
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2012 Jun; 18(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 21610020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The efficacy and safety of FSK0808, filgrastim biosimilar: a multicenter, non-randomized study in Japanese patients with breast cancer.
    Sagara Y; Sato K; Fukuma E; Higaki K; Mizutani M; Osaki A; Takano T; Tokuda Y; Ohno S; Masuda N; Suzuki M; Saeki T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Sep; 43(9):865-73. PubMed ID: 23858037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
    Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of original filgrastim (Neupogen®), biosimilar filgrastim (Leucostim®) and Lenograstim (Granocyte®) in CD34(+) peripheral hematopoietic stem cell mobilization procedures for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant donors.
    Sivgin S; Karakus E; Keklik M; Zararsiz G; Solmaz M; Kaynar L; Eser B; Cetin M; Unal A
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2016 Jun; 54(3):410-5. PubMed ID: 27052362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compatibility of Biosimilar Filgrastim with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy during the Treatment of Malignant Diseases (VENICE): A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-Interventional, Longitudinal Study.
    Fruehauf S; Otremba B; Stötzer O; Rudolph C
    Adv Ther; 2016 Nov; 33(11):1983-2000. PubMed ID: 27743353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biosimilar filgrastim treatment patterns and prevention of febrile neutropenia: a prospective multicentre study in France in patients with solid tumours (the ZOHé study).
    Roché H; Eymard JC; Radji A; Prevost A; Diab R; Lamuraglia M; Soumoudronga RF; Gasnereau I; Toledano A
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Nov; 18(1):1127. PubMed ID: 30445935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind trials comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer.
    Blackwell K; Gascon P; Jones CM; Nixon A; Krendyukov A; Nakov R; Li Y; Harbeck N
    Ann Oncol; 2017 Sep; 28(9):2272-2277. PubMed ID: 28637287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost comparison of outpatient treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) in Germany.
    Hadji P; Kostev K; Schröder-Bernhardi D; Ziller V
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Apr; 50(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 22456299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.