These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35976656)
21. Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Garcia-Ruiz A; Gagner M; Miller JH; Steiner CP; Hahn JF Arch Surg; 1998 Sep; 133(9):957-61. PubMed ID: 9749847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Spatial motion constraints for robot assisted suturing using virtual fixtures. Kapoor A; Li M; Taylor RH Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):89-96. PubMed ID: 16685947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Vargas MV; Moawad G; Denny K; Happ L; Misa NY; Margulies S; Opoku-Anane J; Abi Khalil E; Marfori C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28027975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surgical treatments of lymphedema-a literature review on robot-assisted lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA). Engström O; Mani M Gland Surg; 2024 Jun; 13(6):1066-1075. PubMed ID: 39015714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy. Stefanidis D; Hope WW; Scott DJ Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2141-6. PubMed ID: 21184110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In-Vivo Validation of a Novel Robotic Platform for Endovascular Intervention. Dagnino G; Kundrat D; Kwok TMY; Abdelaziz MEMK; Chi W; Nguyen A; Riga C; Yang GZ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Jun; 70(6):1786-1794. PubMed ID: 37015473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotics and ophthalmology: Are we there yet? Pandey SK; Sharma V Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 67(7):988-994. PubMed ID: 31238393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting. Leijte E; de Blaauw I; Van Workum F; Rosman C; Botden S Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3679-3689. PubMed ID: 31754849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Technical Skill Impacts the Success of Sequential Robotic Suturing Substeps. Sanford DI; Der B; Haque TF; Ma R; Hakim R; Nguyen JH; Cen S; Hung AJ J Endourol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):273-278. PubMed ID: 34779231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Experience related factors compensate for haptic loss in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Cundy TP; Gattas NE; Yang GZ; Darzi A; Najmaldin AS J Endourol; 2014 May; 28(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 24397464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robot-assisted microsurgery: a feasibility study in the rat. Le Roux PD; Das H; Esquenazi S; Kelly PJ Neurosurgery; 2001 Mar; 48(3):584-9. PubMed ID: 11270549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Microinterventional system for robot-assisted gonioscopic surgery- technical feasibility and preclinical evaluation in synthetic eye models. Kamthan G; Meenink T; Morgan IC; Harvey AA; Lince JL; Smit J; Beelen M; Tsai JC; de Smet MD; Ianchulev T BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Aug; 24(1):324. PubMed ID: 39103788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]