BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35977171)

  • 1. Public Awareness of and Personal Willingness to Use California's Extreme Risk Protection Order Law to Prevent Firearm-Related Harm.
    Kravitz-Wirtz N; Aubel AJ; Pallin R; Wintemute GJ
    JAMA Health Forum; 2021 Jun; 2(6):e210975. PubMed ID: 35977171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Firearm Violence Following the Implementation of California's Gun Violence Restraining Order Law.
    Pear VA; Wintemute GJ; Jewell NP; Ahern J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Apr; 5(4):e224216. PubMed ID: 35380646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Firearm Ownership and Support for Political Violence in the United States.
    Wintemute GJ; Crawford A; Robinson SL; Tomsich EA; Reeping PM; Schleimer JP; Pear VA
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Apr; 7(4):e243623. PubMed ID: 38592725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extreme risk protection orders, race/ethnicity, and equity: Evidence from California.
    Pear VA; Schleimer JP; Aubel AJ; Buggs S; Knoepke CE; Pallin R; Shev AB; Tomsich E; Wintemute GJ; Kravitz-Wirtz N
    Prev Med; 2022 Dec; 165(Pt A):107181. PubMed ID: 35940474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gun violence restraining orders in California, 2016-2018: case details and respondent mortality.
    Pear VA; Pallin R; Schleimer JP; Tomsich E; Kravitz-Wirtz N; Shev AB; Knoepke CE; Wintemute GJ
    Inj Prev; 2022 Oct; 28(5):465-471. PubMed ID: 35654574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Public Concern About Violence, Firearms, and the COVID-19 Pandemic in California.
    Kravitz-Wirtz N; Aubel A; Schleimer J; Pallin R; Wintemute G
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jan; 4(1):e2033484. PubMed ID: 33394004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Updated Estimate of the Number of Extreme Risk Protection Orders Needed to Prevent 1 Suicide.
    Miller M; Zhang Y; Studdert DM; Swanson S
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2414864. PubMed ID: 38865130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The origins of California's gun violence restraining order law: a case study using Kingdon's multiple streams framework.
    Tomsich EA; Pear VA; Schleimer JP; Wintemute GJ
    BMC Public Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):1275. PubMed ID: 37391789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Physician Self-reported Knowledge and Use of Maryland's Extreme Risk Protection Order Law.
    Frattaroli S; Hoops K; Irvin NA; McCourt A; Nestadt PS; Omaki E; Shields WC; Wilcox HC
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Dec; 2(12):e1918037. PubMed ID: 31860108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Law Enforcement Officer Knowledge of, Attitudes Toward, and Willingness to Use Extreme Risk Protection Orders.
    Pear VA; De Biasi A; Charbonneau A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Oct; 6(10):e2338455. PubMed ID: 37856122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Firearm Practices, Perceptions of Safety, and Opinions on Injury Prevention Strategies Among California Adults.
    Pallin R; Wintemute GJ; Kravitz-Wirtz N
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2119146. PubMed ID: 34342649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation and perceived effectiveness of gun violence restraining orders in California: A qualitative evaluation.
    Pear VA; Schleimer JP; Tomsich E; Pallin R; Charbonneau A; Wintemute GJ; Knoepke CE
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258547. PubMed ID: 34665820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of Extreme Risk Protection Order Use in California From 2016 to 2019.
    Pallin R; Schleimer JP; Pear VA; Wintemute GJ
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jun; 3(6):e207735. PubMed ID: 32556258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physicians' perspectives on Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) in the clinical setting: Challenges and opportunities for gun violence prevention.
    Hollo A; VanderStoep A; Frattaroli S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274489. PubMed ID: 36099263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Washington : A Statewide Descriptive Study.
    Rowhani-Rahbar A; Bellenger MA; Gibb L; Chesnut H; Lowry-Schiller M; Gause E; Haviland MJ; Rivara FP
    Ann Intern Med; 2020 Sep; 173(5):342-349. PubMed ID: 32598226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Reasons for Ownership and Attitudes About Policies Among Firearm Owners With and Without Children.
    Ye GF; Thatipamala P; Siegel M
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Jan; 5(1):e2142995. PubMed ID: 35029666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Firearm ownership and acquisition in California: findings from the 2018 California Safety and Well-being Survey.
    Kravitz-Wirtz N; Pallin R; Miller M; Azrael D; Wintemute GJ
    Inj Prev; 2020 Dec; 26(6):516-523. PubMed ID: 31806674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of gun violence restraining order laws in the U.S. and firearm suicide among older adults: a longitudinal state-level analysis, 2012-2016.
    Saadi A; Choi KR; Takada S; Zimmerman FJ
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):334. PubMed ID: 32252702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gun Violence Restraining Orders: Alternative or Adjunct to Mental Health-Based Restrictions on Firearms?
    Frattaroli S; McGinty EE; Barnhorst A; Greenberg S
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Jun; 33(2-3):290-307. PubMed ID: 25990840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public Opinion Regarding Whether Speaking With Patients About Firearms Is Appropriate: Results of a National Survey.
    Betz ME; Azrael D; Barber C; Miller M
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Oct; 165(8):543-550. PubMed ID: 27455516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.