These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35977739)
21. Activism for Abortion Rights and Access Is Global: What the United States Can Learn from the Rest of the World. Kumar A J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):593-602. PubMed ID: 36693184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding the Disconnection between Perceptions of Abortion Acceptability and Support for Roe v. Wade among US Adults. Buyuker BE; LaRoche KJ; Bueno X; Jozkowski KN; Crawford BL; Turner RC; Lo WJ J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):649-678. PubMed ID: 36693179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Treating Cancer in Pregnant Patients After Roe v Wade Overturned. Suran M JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1674-1676. PubMed ID: 36173620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Texas court grants woman with non-viable pregnancy right to abortion. Tanne JH BMJ; 2023 Dec; 383():2908. PubMed ID: 38084504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. "Partial-birth abortion" and the Supreme Court. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2001 Jan; 344(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 11150367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Supreme Court, 5-4, narrowing Roe v. Wade, upholds sharp state limits on abortion. Greenhouse L; Dionne EJ N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():1, 10-13. PubMed ID: 11646725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions. Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Internet Searches for Abortion Medications Following the Leaked Supreme Court of the United States Draft Ruling. Poliak A; Satybaldiyeva N; Strathdee SA; Leas EC; Rao R; Smith D; Ayers JW JAMA Intern Med; 2022 Sep; 182(9):1002-1004. PubMed ID: 35767270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Abortion and the Supreme Court: why legislative motive matters. Glantz LH Am J Public Health; 1986 Dec; 76(12):1452-5. PubMed ID: 3777296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Why Roe v. Wade must be defended. The Lancet Lancet; 2022 May; 399(10338):1845. PubMed ID: 35569449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Legal abortion under fierce attack 15 years after Roe v. Wade ruling. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1988 May; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Roe v. Wade and the common law: denying the blessings of liberty to our posterity. Roden GJ Univ West Los Angel Law Rev; 2003; 35():212-96. PubMed ID: 15568273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Beyond Krause JH J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):538-543. PubMed ID: 38088617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond. Martin PA Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Telemedicine, Medication Abortion, and Access After Allsworth JE Am J Public Health; 2022 Aug; 112(8):1086-1088. PubMed ID: 35830673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]