These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35977739)

  • 21. Activism for Abortion Rights and Access Is Global: What the United States Can Learn from the Rest of the World.
    Kumar A
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):593-602. PubMed ID: 36693184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Overturning Roe
    McGovern T
    BMJ; 2022 Apr; 377():o1019. PubMed ID: 35450923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding the Disconnection between Perceptions of Abortion Acceptability and Support for Roe v. Wade among US Adults.
    Buyuker BE; LaRoche KJ; Bueno X; Jozkowski KN; Crawford BL; Turner RC; Lo WJ
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):649-678. PubMed ID: 36693179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Treating Cancer in Pregnant Patients After Roe v Wade Overturned.
    Suran M
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1674-1676. PubMed ID: 36173620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Texas court grants woman with non-viable pregnancy right to abortion.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2023 Dec; 383():2908. PubMed ID: 38084504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
    Bryant MD
    Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. "Partial-birth abortion" and the Supreme Court.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2001 Jan; 344(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 11150367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Supreme Court, 5-4, narrowing Roe v. Wade, upholds sharp state limits on abortion.
    Greenhouse L; Dionne EJ
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():1, 10-13. PubMed ID: 11646725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Texas Supreme Court blocks permitted abortion for woman with non-viable pregnancy.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2023 Dec; 383():2920. PubMed ID: 38081657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions.
    Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Internet Searches for Abortion Medications Following the Leaked Supreme Court of the United States Draft Ruling.
    Poliak A; Satybaldiyeva N; Strathdee SA; Leas EC; Rao R; Smith D; Ayers JW
    JAMA Intern Med; 2022 Sep; 182(9):1002-1004. PubMed ID: 35767270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Abortion and the Supreme Court: why legislative motive matters.
    Glantz LH
    Am J Public Health; 1986 Dec; 76(12):1452-5. PubMed ID: 3777296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Why Roe v. Wade must be defended.
    The Lancet
    Lancet; 2022 May; 399(10338):1845. PubMed ID: 35569449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Legal abortion under fierce attack 15 years after Roe v. Wade ruling.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 May; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Roe v. Wade and the common law: denying the blessings of liberty to our posterity.
    Roden GJ
    Univ West Los Angel Law Rev; 2003; 35():212-96. PubMed ID: 15568273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Beyond
    Krause JH
    J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):538-543. PubMed ID: 38088617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Telemedicine, Medication Abortion, and Access After
    Allsworth JE
    Am J Public Health; 2022 Aug; 112(8):1086-1088. PubMed ID: 35830673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.