334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35978274)
21. Optimization of PET reconstruction algorithm, SUV thresholding algorithm and PET acquisition time in clinical 11C-acetate PET/CT.
Strandberg S; Hashemi A; Axelsson J; Riklund K
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209169. PubMed ID: 30543705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optimization of
Alqahtani MM; Willowson KP; Constable C; Fulton R; Kench PL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 23(4):e13528. PubMed ID: 35049129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of conventional and Si-photomultiplier-based PET systems for image quality and diagnostic performance.
Oddstig J; Leide Svegborn S; Almquist H; Bitzén U; Garpered S; Hedeer F; Hindorf C; Jögi J; Jönsson L; Minarik D; Petersson R; Welinder A; Wollmer P; Trägårdh E
BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Oct; 19(1):81. PubMed ID: 31640584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Time-of-Flight Information Improved the Detectability of Subcentimeter Spheres Using a Clinical PET/CT Scanner.
Hashimoto N; Morita K; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Baba S; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Sep; 46(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 29599404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability.
Morey AM; Kadrmas DJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 24221921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Determining the Minimal Required Radioactivity of 18F-FDG for Reliable Semiquantification in PET/CT Imaging: A Phantom Study.
Chen MK; Menard DH; Cheng DW
J Nucl Med Technol; 2016 Mar; 44(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 26769598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital PET/CT allows for shorter acquisition protocols or reduced radiopharmaceutical dose in [
Alberts I; Sachpekidis C; Prenosil G; Viscione M; Bohn KP; Mingels C; Shi K; Ashar-Oromieh A; Rominger A
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 Apr; 35(4):485-492. PubMed ID: 33550515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance Characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT System with a Long Axial Field of View Using the NEMA NU 2-2018 Standard.
Prenosil GA; Sari H; Fürstner M; Afshar-Oromieh A; Shi K; Rominger A; Hentschel M
J Nucl Med; 2022 Mar; 63(3):476-484. PubMed ID: 34301780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact of list-mode reconstruction and image-space point spread function correction on PET image contrast and quantitative value using SiPM-based PET/CT system.
Shirakawa Y; Matsutomo N
Radiol Phys Technol; 2023 Sep; 16(3):384-396. PubMed ID: 37368168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of maximum likelihood and conventional PET scatter scaling methods for
Bal H; Kiser JW; Conti M; Bowen SL
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4218-4228. PubMed ID: 34013586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Using EQ·PET to reduce reconstruction-dependent variations in [
Vanhoutte M; Semah F; Lopes R; Jaillard A; Petyt G; Aziz AL; Lahousse H; Declerck J; Pasquier F; Spottiswoode B; Fahmi R
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):175002. PubMed ID: 31344691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluating and comparing the image quality and quantification accuracy of SiPM-PET/CT and PMT-PET/CT.
Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Himuro K; Kato T; Baba S; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):725-735. PubMed ID: 32621167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.
Boellaard R; van Lingen A; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):808-17. PubMed ID: 11337581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Towards guidelines to harmonize textural features in PET: Haralick textural features vary with image noise, but exposure-invariant domains enable comparable PET radiomics.
Prenosil GA; Weitzel T; Fürstner M; Hentschel M; Krause T; Cumming P; Rominger A; Klaeser B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229560. PubMed ID: 32176698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of acquisition time and penalizing factor in a block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm on a Si-photomultiplier-based PET-CT system for
Trägårdh E; Minarik D; Almquist H; Bitzén U; Garpered S; Hvittfelt E; Olsson B; Oddstig J
EJNMMI Res; 2019 Jul; 9(1):64. PubMed ID: 31342214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Examination of Optimal Window Size and Acquisition Time of Respiratory-gated PET Image: Phantom Study with a SiPM-based PET/CT Scanner].
Sato R; Odagiri H; Ikawa M; Sasaki H; Takanami K; Sato K; Usui A; Saito H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(8):795-801. PubMed ID: 32814734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
