177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35978388)
1. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of tantalum components in the management of acetabular reconstruction following periacetabular oncologic resection in primary malignancies.
Zan P; Ma X; Wang H; Cai Z; Shen J; Sun W
Eur J Med Res; 2022 Aug; 27(1):151. PubMed ID: 35978388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early Results of Acetabular Reconstruction After Wide Periacetabular Oncologic Resection.
Abdel MP; von Roth P; Perry KI; Rose PS; Lewallen DG; Sim FH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Feb; 99(3):e9. PubMed ID: 28145959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. LUMiC
Bus MP; Szafranski A; Sellevold S; Goryn T; Jutte PC; Bramer JA; Fiocco M; Streitbürger A; Kotrych D; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Porous Tantalum Acetabular Implants and Harrington Reconstruction for Metastatic Disease of the Acetabulum.
Houdek MT; Ferguson PC; Abdel MP; Griffin AM; Hevesi M; Perry KI; Rose PS; Wunder JS; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Jul; 102(14):1239-1247. PubMed ID: 32675673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of reconstructive techniques after acetabular resection for pelvic chondrosarcoma.
Houdek MT; Wunder JS; Abdel MP; Griffin AM; Hevesi M; Rose PS; Ferguson PC; Lewallen DG
Bone Joint J; 2021 Feb; 103-B(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 33517732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acetabular Reconstruction With Femoral Head Autograft After Intraarticular Resection of Periacetabular Tumors is Durable at Short-term Followup.
Tang X; Guo W; Yang R; Yan T; Tang S; Li D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3060-3070. PubMed ID: 28948491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome of Patients Treated With Porous Tantalum Acetabular Implants for Neoplastic Periacetabular Lesions.
Houdek MT; Abdel MP; Perry KI; Salduz A; Rose PS; Sim FH; Lewallen DG
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Mar; 28(6):256-262. PubMed ID: 31305354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical technique: Porous tantalum reconstruction for destructive nonprimary periacetabular tumors.
Khan FA; Rose PS; Yanagisawa M; Lewallen DG; Sim FH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):594-601. PubMed ID: 21989784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Porous tantalum acetabular cups for reconstructions after peri-acetabular resections of primary bone tumours.
Zucchini R; Sambri A; Giannini C; Fiore M; Calamelli C; Donati DM; De Paolis M
Hip Int; 2023 Jan; 33(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 33829914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pelvic reconstruction using saddle prosthesis following limb salvage operation for periacetabular tumour.
Kitagawa Y; Ek ET; Choong PF
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2006 Aug; 14(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 16914780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Use of Porous Tantalum Augments for the Reconstruction of Acetabular Defect in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Ling TX; Li JL; Zhou K; Xiao Q; Pei FX; Zhou ZK
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):453-459. PubMed ID: 29033154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical resection and reconstructive techniques using autologous femoral head bone-grafting in treating partial acetabular defects arising from primary pelvic malignant tumors.
Sun W; Zan P; Ma X; Hua Y; Shen J; Cai Z
BMC Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(1):969. PubMed ID: 31627719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effectiveness analysis of resection and reconstruction of primary bone tumor in pelvic zone
Huang J; Cheng J; Wang T; Xu M; Han G; Jia J; Wang W; Tu C; Bi W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Mar; 37(3):277-283. PubMed ID: 36940984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review.
Brown TS; Salib CG; Rose PS; Sim FH; Lewallen DG; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1 Supple A):22-30. PubMed ID: 29292336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Application of porous tantalum Jumbo cup in revision of hip arthroplasty].
Wang YH; Zou SP; Chen B; Chen CL; Chen WZ
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2022 Jan; 35(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 35130594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up.
Löchel J; Janz V; Hipfl C; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30813786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of periacetabular tumors.
Jansen JA; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jan; 471(1):324-31. PubMed ID: 23054524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reconstruction of the hemipelvis with saddle prosthesis after excision of malignant tumors around the pelvis and acetabulum: a report of 12 cases].
Fu M; Shen JN; Huang G; Wang J; Fu QZ; Yang ZH
Ai Zheng; 2007 Nov; 26(11):1237-42. PubMed ID: 17991325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periacetabular Metastatic Disease. An Original Technique of Reconstruction According to the Harrington Classification.
Wegrzyn J; Malatray M; Al-Qahtani T; Pibarot V; Confavreux C; Freyer G
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2546-2555. PubMed ID: 29656965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
