183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35978388)
21. Long-term results of combined porous tantalum augments and titanium-coated cups for Paprosky type III bone defects in acetabular revision.
Xiao Q; Xu B; Zhou K; Ling T; Yuan M; Pei F; Zhou Z
Int Orthop; 2021 Jul; 45(7):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 34019127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup.
Del Gaizo DJ; Kancherla V; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 22090355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cup-on-cup technique: a reliable management solution for severe acetabular bone loss in revision total hip replacement.
Chiarlone F; Cavagnaro L; Zanirato A; Alessio Mazzola M; Lovisolo S; Mosconi L; Felli L; Burastero G
Hip Int; 2020 Sep; 30(1_suppl):12-18. PubMed ID: 32907429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Porous tantalum shells and augments for acetabular cup revisions.
Moličnik A; Hanc M; Rečnik G; Krajnc Z; Rupreht M; Fokter SK
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Aug; 24(6):911-7. PubMed ID: 24241214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Efficacy of reconstruction with modular endoprosthesis after resection of periacetabular malignant tumors].
Guo X; Liu T; Li X; Li Z; Peng D; Zhang X; Zhang Q
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Sep; 41(9):962-8. PubMed ID: 27640795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Survivorship of a Porous Tantalum Monoblock Acetabular Component in Primary Hip Arthroplasty With a Mean Follow-Up of 18 Years.
Macheras GA; Lepetsos P; Leonidou AO; Anastasopoulos PP; Galanakos SP; Poultsides LA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Dec; 32(12):3680-3684. PubMed ID: 28734611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Application of modified Gibson combined with modified ilioinguinal approach in treatment of Enneking
Min L; Li L; Hu X; Zhang Y; Wang J; Lu M; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Luo Y; Tang F; Duan H; Tu C
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jul; 36(7):796-803. PubMed ID: 35848173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.
Lachiewicz PF; O'Dell JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 29529665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Middle term results of tantalum acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty following pelvic irradiation.
De Paolis M; Zucchini R; Romagnoli C; Romantini M; Mariotti F; Donati DM
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2019 May; 53(3):165-169. PubMed ID: 30956022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Functional outcome and complications following reconstruction for Harrington class II and III periacetabular metastasis.
Kiatisevi P; Sukunthanak B; Pakpianpairoj C; Liupolvanish P
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 13():4. PubMed ID: 25578802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Composite Reconstruction With Irradiated Autograft Plus Total Hip Replacement After Type II Pelvic Resections for Tumors Is Feasible but Fraught With Complications.
Vahabi A; Kaya H; Tosyalı HK; Keçeci B; Sabah D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38666740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Outcomes of Revisions of the Acetabular Component of THA with Paprosky Type 3a and 3b Defects Using Tantalum Trabecular Metal Implants 2-10 Years Postoperatively].
Musil D; Trnka T; Klouda J; PertlÍČek J; Held M; StehlÍk J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(6):387-395. PubMed ID: 33408003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reconstruction using a constrained-type hip tumor prosthesis after resection of malignant periacetabular tumors: A study by the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group (JMOG).
Ogura K; Susa M; Morioka H; Matsumine A; Ishii T; Hamada K; Ueda T; Kawai A
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 117(7):1455-1463. PubMed ID: 29473959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Porous Tantalum Monoblock Acetabular Component in Primary Hip Arthroplasty: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.
De Martino I; De Santis V; Sculco PK; D'Apolito R; Poultsides LA; Gasparini G
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):110-4. PubMed ID: 26781387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Survival, complications and functional outcomes of cemented megaprostheses for high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee.
Zhang C; Hu J; Zhu K; Cai T; Ma X
Int Orthop; 2018 Apr; 42(4):927-938. PubMed ID: 29427125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Midterm Outcomes After Reconstruction of Superolateral Acetabular Defects Using Flying Buttress Porous Tantalum Augments During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Cassar-Gheiti AJ; Mei XY; Afenu EA; Safir OA; Gross AE; Kuzyk PRT
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Aug; 36(8):2936-2941. PubMed ID: 33840542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Preliminary proposal: a classification system for reconstruction with autologous femoral head after periacetabular tumors resection.
Yi C; Zheng J; Li R; Lan Y; He M; Lai J; Guan T; Pang F; Mo Z; Chen P; Li Y; Zhou N; Yang X; Fang B
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Feb; 16(1):119. PubMed ID: 33557910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The use of iliac stem prosthesis for acetabular defects following resections for periacetabular tumors.
De Paolis M; Biazzo A; Romagnoli C; Alì N; Giannini S; Donati DM
ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():717031. PubMed ID: 24250275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Temporary External Fixation Can Stabilize Hip Transposition Arthroplasty After Resection of Malignant Periacetabular Bone Tumors.
Kunisada T; Fujiwara T; Hasei J; Nakata E; Senda M; Ozaki T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 477(8):1892-1901. PubMed ID: 30985613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 19582528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
