These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35978484)

  • 1. Recommendations for quantifying and reducing uncertainty in climate projections of species distributions.
    Brodie S; Smith JA; Muhling BA; Barnett LAK; Carroll G; Fiedler P; Bograd SJ; Hazen EL; Jacox MG; Andrews KS; Barnes CL; Crozier LG; Fiechter J; Fredston A; Haltuch MA; Harvey CJ; Holmes E; Karp MA; Liu OR; Malick MJ; Pozo Buil M; Richerson K; Rooper CN; Samhouri J; Seary R; Selden RL; Thompson AR; Tommasi D; Ward EJ; Kaplan IC
    Glob Chang Biol; 2022 Nov; 28(22):6586-6601. PubMed ID: 35978484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Twenty-first-century climate change impacts on marine animal biomass and ecosystem structure across ocean basins.
    Bryndum-Buchholz A; Tittensor DP; Blanchard JL; Cheung WWL; Coll M; Galbraith ED; Jennings S; Maury O; Lotze HK
    Glob Chang Biol; 2019 Feb; 25(2):459-472. PubMed ID: 30408274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing uncertainties in land cover projections.
    Alexander P; Prestele R; Verburg PH; Arneth A; Baranzelli C; Batista E Silva F; Brown C; Butler A; Calvin K; Dendoncker N; Doelman JC; Dunford R; Engström K; Eitelberg D; Fujimori S; Harrison PA; Hasegawa T; Havlik P; Holzhauer S; Humpenöder F; Jacobs-Crisioni C; Jain AK; Krisztin T; Kyle P; Lavalle C; Lenton T; Liu J; Meiyappan P; Popp A; Powell T; Sands RD; Schaldach R; Stehfest E; Steinbuks J; Tabeau A; van Meijl H; Wise MA; Rounsevell MD
    Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Feb; 23(2):767-781. PubMed ID: 27474896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Climate disequilibrium dominates uncertainty in long-term projections of primary productivity.
    Felton AJ; Shriver RK; Stemkovski M; Bradford JB; Suding KN; Adler PB
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Dec; 25(12):2688-2698. PubMed ID: 36269682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing and synthesizing quantitative distribution models and qualitative vulnerability assessments to project marine species distributions under climate change.
    Allyn AJ; Alexander MA; Franklin BS; Massiot-Granier F; Pershing AJ; Scott JD; Mills KE
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231595. PubMed ID: 32298349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contribution of crop model structure, parameters and climate projections to uncertainty in climate change impact assessments.
    Tao F; Rötter RP; Palosuo T; Gregorio Hernández Díaz-Ambrona C; Mínguez MI; Semenov MA; Kersebaum KC; Nendel C; Specka X; Hoffmann H; Ewert F; Dambreville A; Martre P; Rodríguez L; Ruiz-Ramos M; Gaiser T; Höhn JG; Salo T; Ferrise R; Bindi M; Cammarano D; Schulman AH
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Mar; 24(3):1291-1307. PubMed ID: 29245185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological ensemble modeling to evaluate potential futures of living marine resources.
    Gårdmark A; Lindegren M; Neuenfeldt S; Blenckner T; Heikinheimo O; Müller-Karulis B; Niiranen S; Tomczak MT; Aro E; Wikström A; Möllmann C
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jun; 23(4):742-54. PubMed ID: 23865226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Global ensemble projections reveal trophic amplification of ocean biomass declines with climate change.
    Lotze HK; Tittensor DP; Bryndum-Buchholz A; Eddy TD; Cheung WWL; Galbraith ED; Barange M; Barrier N; Bianchi D; Blanchard JL; Bopp L; Büchner M; Bulman CM; Carozza DA; Christensen V; Coll M; Dunne JP; Fulton EA; Jennings S; Jones MC; Mackinson S; Maury O; Niiranen S; Oliveros-Ramos R; Roy T; Fernandes JA; Schewe J; Shin YJ; Silva TAM; Steenbeek J; Stock CA; Verley P; Volkholz J; Walker ND; Worm B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jun; 116(26):12907-12912. PubMed ID: 31186360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncertainty in projections of future lake thermal dynamics is differentially driven by lake and global climate models.
    Wynne JH; Woelmer W; Moore TN; Thomas RQ; Weathers KC; Carey CC
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15445. PubMed ID: 37283896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consensus forecasting of species distributions: the effects of niche model performance and niche properties.
    Zhang L; Liu S; Sun P; Wang T; Wang G; Zhang X; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120056. PubMed ID: 25786217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cloudy forecast for species distribution models: Predictive uncertainties abound for California birds after a century of climate and land-use change.
    Clare JDJ; de Valpine P; Moanga DA; Tingley MW; Beissinger SR
    Glob Chang Biol; 2024 Jan; 30(1):e17019. PubMed ID: 37987241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporating abundance information and guiding variable selection for climate-based ensemble forecasting of species' distributional shifts.
    Tanner EP; Papeş M; Elmore RD; Fuhlendorf SD; Davis CA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184316. PubMed ID: 28886075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ecological forecasting of tree growth: Regional fusion of tree-ring and forest inventory data to quantify drivers and characterize uncertainty.
    Heilman KA; Dietze MC; Arizpe AA; Aragon J; Gray A; Shaw JD; Finley AO; Klesse S; DeRose RJ; Evans MEK
    Glob Chang Biol; 2022 Apr; 28(7):2442-2460. PubMed ID: 35023229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A mid-century ecological forecast with partitioned uncertainty predicts increases in loblolly pine forest productivity.
    Thomas RQ; Jersild AL; Brooks EB; Thomas VA; Wynne RH
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Sep; 28(6):1503-1519. PubMed ID: 29999562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remote-sensing based approach to forecast habitat quality under climate change scenarios.
    Requena-Mullor JM; López E; Castro AJ; Alcaraz-Segura D; Castro H; Reyes A; Cabello J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172107. PubMed ID: 28257501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Next-generation ensemble projections reveal higher climate risks for marine ecosystems.
    Tittensor DP; Novaglio C; Harrison CS; Heneghan RF; Barrier N; Bianchi D; Bopp L; Bryndum-Buchholz A; Britten GL; Büchner M; Cheung WWL; Christensen V; Coll M; Dunne JP; Eddy TD; Everett JD; Fernandes-Salvador JA; Fulton EA; Galbraith ED; Gascuel D; Guiet J; John JG; Link JS; Lotze HK; Maury O; Ortega-Cisneros K; Palacios-Abrantes J; Petrik CM; du Pontavice H; Rault J; Richardson AJ; Shannon L; Shin YJ; Steenbeek J; Stock CA; Blanchard JL
    Nat Clim Chang; 2021; 11(11):973-981. PubMed ID: 34745348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choice of baseline climate data impacts projected species' responses to climate change.
    Baker DJ; Hartley AJ; Butchart SH; Willis SG
    Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Jul; 22(7):2392-404. PubMed ID: 26950769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Projecting marine species range shifts from only temperature can mask climate vulnerability.
    McHenry J; Welch H; Lester SE; Saba V
    Glob Chang Biol; 2019 Dec; 25(12):4208-4221. PubMed ID: 31487434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uncertainty of future projections of species distributions in mountainous regions.
    Tang Y; Winkler JA; Viña A; Liu J; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Li X; Wang F; Zhang J; Zhao Z
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0189496. PubMed ID: 29320501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Major challenges for correlational ecological niche model projections to future climate conditions.
    Peterson AT; Cobos ME; Jiménez-García D
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Oct; 1429(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 29923606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.